StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Terminal Emulators
  5. SecureCRT vs Windows Terminal

SecureCRT vs Windows Terminal

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SecureCRT
SecureCRT
Stacks4
Followers5
Votes0
Windows Terminal
Windows Terminal
Stacks155
Followers175
Votes6
GitHub Stars100.8K
Forks8.9K

SecureCRT vs Windows Terminal: What are the differences?

Introduction

This comparison will outline the key differences between SecureCRT and Windows Terminal in terms of their features and functionality.

  1. Customizability: SecureCRT offers extensive customization options, allowing users to personalize their terminal session layouts, fonts, colors, and keyboard mappings. On the other hand, Windows Terminal also offers some degree of customization, but it is more limited compared to SecureCRT.

  2. Protocol Support: SecureCRT supports a wide range of protocols such as SSH, Telnet, Serial, and others, making it suitable for various network administration tasks. In contrast, Windows Terminal primarily focuses on supporting modern command-line applications and does not have the same level of protocol support as SecureCRT.

  3. Multiple Sessions: SecureCRT allows users to manage multiple simultaneous sessions within a tabbed interface, making it convenient for working with different remote connections efficiently. Windows Terminal, on the other hand, also has support for multiple sessions but does not provide the same level of tabbed interface functionality as SecureCRT.

  4. Scripting and Automation: SecureCRT offers a powerful scripting language that enables users to automate repetitive tasks and perform complex scripting operations. Windows Terminal, however, does not provide the same level of scripting and automation capabilities as SecureCRT.

  5. Multi-platform Support: Windows Terminal is a cross-platform application that can be used on Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing a consistent command-line experience across different operating systems. SecureCRT, on the other hand, is primarily designed for Windows and does not have the same level of compatibility with macOS and Linux.

  6. Security Features: SecureCRT offers enhanced security features such as secure file transfer, support for public-key authentication methods, strong encryption algorithms, and secure remote access options. Windows Terminal, while providing a secure environment, does not have the same level of comprehensive security features compared to SecureCRT.

In summary, SecureCRT offers more extensive customization options, broader protocol support, better session management with a tabbed interface, powerful scripting and automation capabilities, primarily designed for Windows with limited cross-platform support, and enhanced security features. Windows Terminal, on the other hand, prioritizes a more modern command-line experience, with some customization options and cross-platform compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SecureCRT
SecureCRT
Windows Terminal
Windows Terminal

It provides rock-solid terminal emulation for computing professionals, raising productivity with advanced session management and a host of ways to save time and streamline repetitive tasks. It provides secure remote access, file transfer, and data tunneling for everyone in your organization.

A new, modern, feature-rich, productive terminal application for command-line users. It includes many of the features most frequently requested by the Windows command-line community.

Keyword highlighting enhancement; Command Manager (Windows only); Local shell session (Windows); True Color support; Dark Mode support
Tabs; Rich text; Rlobalization; Configurability; Theming; Styling
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
100.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
8.9K
Stacks
4
Stacks
155
Followers
5
Followers
175
Votes
0
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Can be highly customized by using terminal preview
  • 2
    Add almost any cli tool using profiles
  • 2
    Free
Integrations
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
GNU Bash
GNU Bash

What are some alternatives to SecureCRT, Windows Terminal?

iTerm2

iTerm2

A replacement for Terminal and the successor to iTerm. It works on Macs with macOS 10.12 or newer. iTerm2 brings the terminal into the modern age with features you never knew you always wanted.

Putty

Putty

It is an SSH and telnet client, developed originally by Simon Tatham for the Windows platform. It is open source software that is available with source code and is developed and supported by a group of volunteers.

Alacritty

Alacritty

It is the fastest terminal emulator in existence. Using the GPU for rendering enables optimizations that simply aren't possible without it. It currently supports macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows.

Hyper Terminal

Hyper Terminal

The goal of the project is to create a beautiful and extensible experience for command-line interface users, built on open web standards. Focus will be primarily around speed and stability.

Cmder

Cmder

It is a software package created out of pure frustration over the absence of nice console emulators on Windows. It is based on amazing software, and spiced up with the Monokai color scheme and a custom prompt layout.

ConEmu

ConEmu

It aims to be handy, comprehensive, fast and reliable terminal window where you may host any console application developed either for WinAPI (cmd, powershell, far) or Unix PTY (cygwin, msys, wsl bash).

Wave Terminal

Wave Terminal

It is an open-source, AI-native terminal that streamlines developer workflows with inline rendering, a modern UI, and persistent sessions. It offers plugins for rendering various file types, a powerful code editor, seamless local and remote session management, and native AI integration.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope