StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Spring vs Vert.x

Spring vs Vert.x

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring
Spring
Stacks3.9K
Followers4.8K
Votes1.1K
GitHub Stars59.1K
Forks38.8K
Vert.x
Vert.x
Stacks259
Followers325
Votes59

Spring vs Vert.x: What are the differences?

## Introduction

1. **Concurrency Model**: Spring is based on a multi-threaded model, while Vert.x utilizes an event-driven and non-blocking architecture. This difference impacts how applications handle a high volume of requests and scalability.
2. **Programming Language Support**: Spring primarily supports Java, while Vert.x offers polyglot support, allowing developers to write applications in various languages such as Java, JavaScript, Kotlin, and Groovy. This flexibility provides more options for developers to choose the language that best suits their project requirements.
3. **Middleware Compatibility**: Spring integrates well with existing Java EE middlewares and frameworks, making it a preferred choice for enterprises with established infrastructure. In contrast, Vert.x is more lightweight and can be easily integrated with different types of middleware due to its modular and flexible design.
4. **Deployment Model**: Spring applications are typically packaged as WAR files and deployed on application servers, while Vert.x applications can be packaged as fat jars and run independently without the need for an application server. This difference simplifies the deployment process for Vert.x applications.
5. **Reactive Programming**: Vert.x is designed with reactive programming principles in mind, providing tools and libraries to build responsive and resilient applications. Spring, on the other hand, can be adapted to support reactive programming but may require more effort and additional dependencies. This difference affects how developers approach building and handling asynchronous operations.
6. **Community and Ecosystem**: Spring has a larger and more established community with extensive documentation, support, and a wide range of third-party libraries and tools. Vert.x, while growing rapidly, has a smaller community but excels in its focus on performance, scalability, and modern development practices like reactive programming. Developers may choose between the two based on community support and ecosystem availability.

In Summary, Spring and Vert.x differ in their concurrency models, language support, middleware compatibility, deployment models, approach to reactive programming, and community ecosystems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Spring, Vert.x

Kamrul
Kamrul

Aug 16, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoSpring BootSpring Boot

I am a graduate student working as a software engineer in a company. For my personal development, I want to learn web development. I have some experience in Springboot while I was in university. So I want to continue with spring-boot, but I heard about Django. I'm reaching out to the experts here to help me choose a future proof framework. Django or Spring Boot?

Thanks in Advance

502k views502k
Comments
Asheesh
Asheesh

Dec 29, 2019

Needs advice

Hi, I am new to backend development and trying to make a decision about whether I should choose Nodejs or Spring Boot for a backend developer role. I have done 5 years of Android development and find using Java much better than javascript. Please advise why one is better over others and which one is good for the long term, also please highlight the job opportunities for both.

39.1k views39.1k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring
Spring
Vert.x
Vert.x

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

It is event driven and non blocking application framework. This means your app can handle a lot of concurrency using a small number of kernel threads. It lets your app scale with minimal hardware.

-
polygot; Simple concurrency model
Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
38.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.9K
Stacks
259
Followers
4.8K
Followers
325
Votes
1.1K
Votes
59
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 230
    Java
  • 157
    Open source
  • 136
    Great community
  • 123
    Very powerful
  • 114
    Enterprise
Cons
  • 15
    Draws you into its own ecosystem and bloat
  • 4
    Poor documentation
  • 3
    Java
  • 3
    Verbose configuration
  • 2
    Java is more verbose language in compare to python
Pros
  • 13
    Light weight
  • 12
    Fast
  • 8
    Java
  • 6
    Developers Are Super
  • 5
    Extensible
Cons
  • 2
    Steep Learning Curve
  • 2
    Too Many Conflicting Versions And Suggestions
Integrations
Java
Java
JavaScript
JavaScript
Ruby
Ruby
Java
Java
Kotlin
Kotlin
Groovy
Groovy

What are some alternatives to Spring, Vert.x?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase