StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. ABP Commercial vs Android SDK

ABP Commercial vs Android SDK

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Android SDK
Android SDK
Stacks27.6K
Followers20.7K
Votes800
ABP Commercial
ABP Commercial
Stacks21
Followers63
Votes31

ABP Commercial vs Android SDK: What are the differences?

Introduction: When comparing ABP Commercial and Android SDK, it is crucial to understand the key differences between the two in order to make an informed decision for your project.

  1. Target Audience: ABP Commercial is targeted towards enterprise-level businesses looking for a comprehensive framework for building modern, scalable, and maintainable applications. On the other hand, Android SDK is focused on providing developers with tools and resources to create applications specifically for the Android platform.

  2. Features and Functionality: ABP Commercial offers a wide range of features such as built-in authentication, authorization, and multi-tenancy support, along with a modular architecture for easy customization and extension. Android SDK, on the other hand, provides developers with APIs for interacting with device hardware, integrating with system services, and building user interfaces to create native Android applications.

  3. Licensing and Cost: ABP Commercial is a paid solution that requires a license for commercial use, while Android SDK is open-source and free to use for developing Android applications. This distinction in licensing and cost can influence the decision-making process for businesses and developers.

  4. Support and Maintenance: ABP Commercial comes with professional support and regular updates from the development team, ensuring a reliable and up-to-date framework for building applications. In contrast, Android SDK is supported by the community, and developers may need to rely on forums and documentation for assistance and updates.

  5. Ecosystem and Integration: ABP Commercial offers a comprehensive ecosystem with built-in tools for various aspects of application development, such as backend services, hosting, and deployment. Android SDK integrates seamlessly with other Google services and products, providing developers with a cohesive ecosystem for building Android applications.

  6. Platform Independence: ABP Commercial is platform-agnostic and can be used to build applications for different platforms, including web, mobile, and desktop. Android SDK, on the other hand, is specifically designed for developing applications for the Android operating system, limiting its compatibility with other platforms.

In Summary, ABP Commercial is tailored for enterprise-level businesses with comprehensive features and support, while Android SDK is focused on providing developers with tools for building native Android applications within an open-source ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Android SDK, ABP Commercial

Omran
Omran

CTO & Co-founder at Bonton Connect

Jun 19, 2020

Needs adviceonKotlinKotlin

We actually initially wrote a lot of networking code in Kotlin but the complexities involved prompted us to try and compile NodeJS for Android and port over all the networking logic to Node and communicate with node over the Java Native Interface.

This turned out to be a great decision considering our battery usage fell by 40% and rate of development increased by a factor of 2.

622k views622k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Android SDK
Android SDK
ABP Commercial
ABP Commercial

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

It is a complete web development platform based on the ABP framework. It provides pre-built application modules, rapid application development tooling, professional UI themes, premium support and more.

-
ABP CLI; Modularity; Multi-Tenancy; Bootstrap Tag Helpers; Dynamic Forms; Authentication & Authorization; Cross-Cutting Concerns; Bundling & Minification; Virtual File System; Theming; Domain-Driven Design Infrastructure; Auto Rest Apis; Dynamic Client Proxies; Distributed Event Bus With RabbitMQ Integration; Test Infrastructure; Audit Logging & Entity Histories; Object To Object Mapping; Email & Sms Abstractions With Templating Support; Aspect-Oriented Programming; Dependency Injection By Conventions; Data Filtering
Statistics
Stacks
27.6K
Stacks
21
Followers
20.7K
Followers
63
Votes
800
Votes
31
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 289
    Android development
  • 156
    Necessary for android
  • 128
    Android studio
  • 86
    Mobile framework
  • 82
    Backed by google
Pros
  • 4
    Development productivity tools
  • 4
    Supports micro-service architecture
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 3
    Open source ABP framework behind
  • 3
    Professional UI themes
Integrations
Java
Java
Blazor
Blazor
.NET Core
.NET Core
MongoDB
MongoDB
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Hangfire
Hangfire
Chartbrew
Chartbrew

What are some alternatives to Android SDK, ABP Commercial?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase