StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. ABP Commercial vs ServiceStack

ABP Commercial vs ServiceStack

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ServiceStack
ServiceStack
Stacks191
Followers49
Votes0
ABP Commercial
ABP Commercial
Stacks21
Followers63
Votes31

ABP Commercial vs ServiceStack: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here are the key differences between ABP Commercial and ServiceStack:

  1. Platform Support: ABP Commercial is built on the ASP.NET Core platform, providing support for both .NET Framework and .NET Core. On the other hand, ServiceStack is designed for the .NET Framework and does not have built-in support for .NET Core.

  2. Modularity: ABP Commercial follows a modular architecture, allowing developers to build applications by combining multiple pre-built modules. This modular design promotes code reuse and simplifies the development process. In contrast, ServiceStack follows a more monolithic approach where the framework provides a comprehensive set of features and functionalities as a whole.

  3. Subscription Model: ABP Commercial follows a subscription-based pricing model, where users need to purchase licenses to access certain features and receive support. This subscription model offers regular updates, hotfixes, and technical assistance. On the other hand, ServiceStack follows an open-source model where the core framework is free to use, but additional commercial support and consulting services are available for a fee.

  4. Built-in Domain Driven Design (DDD) Support: ABP Commercial includes built-in support for Domain Driven Design (DDD) concepts such as aggregates, entities, value objects, and repositories. This DDD integration simplifies the development of complex business applications. ServiceStack, on the other hand, primarily focuses on providing RESTful services and does not have built-in DDD support.

  5. GUI Development: ABP Commercial includes a web application framework (ASP.NET MVC) and a rich set of UI controls (ABP UI) that simplify the development of user interfaces. These UI controls provide features such as dynamic form generation, localization, multi-tenancy, and user permissions. ServiceStack, on the other hand, is more focused on providing API development tools and does not have the same level of support for GUI development.

  6. Authentication and Authorization: ABP Commercial provides a comprehensive identity and access management system that supports various authentication methods (such as username/password, social logins, and external identity providers) and role-based authorization. ServiceStack also provides authentication and authorization features, but the options and ease of use may vary compared to ABP Commercial.

In Summary, ABP Commercial is a modular framework built on ASP.NET Core, providing rich GUI development features, built-in DDD support, and a subscription model for regular updates and technical assistance. On the other hand, ServiceStack is a comprehensive framework for API development in the .NET Framework, focusing on RESTful services, and follows an open-source model with additional commercial support available.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ServiceStack
ServiceStack
ABP Commercial
ABP Commercial

It is a configuration free, code-first, light-weight framework built on top of ASP.NET for building services and web applications. As the name suggests, it is a stack of services. It provides with just everything that one needs for building end-to-end web services.

It is a complete web development platform based on the ABP framework. It provides pre-built application modules, rapid application development tooling, professional UI themes, premium support and more.

-
ABP CLI; Modularity; Multi-Tenancy; Bootstrap Tag Helpers; Dynamic Forms; Authentication & Authorization; Cross-Cutting Concerns; Bundling & Minification; Virtual File System; Theming; Domain-Driven Design Infrastructure; Auto Rest Apis; Dynamic Client Proxies; Distributed Event Bus With RabbitMQ Integration; Test Infrastructure; Audit Logging & Entity Histories; Object To Object Mapping; Email & Sms Abstractions With Templating Support; Aspect-Oriented Programming; Dependency Injection By Conventions; Data Filtering
Statistics
Stacks
191
Stacks
21
Followers
49
Followers
63
Votes
0
Votes
31
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Development productivity tools
  • 4
    Supports micro-service architecture
  • 3
    Enterprise ready, feature rich, pre-built modules
  • 3
    Professional UI themes
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
MongoDB
MongoDB
Blazor
Blazor
.NET Core
.NET Core
MongoDB
MongoDB
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Hangfire
Hangfire
Chartbrew
Chartbrew

What are some alternatives to ServiceStack, ABP Commercial?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase