.NET Core vs Actix: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. Runtime Environment: .NET Core is a framework that runs on the Common Language Runtime (CLR) provided by Microsoft, while Actix is built on the Rust programming language, which focuses on performance and safety.
2. Language Support: .NET Core supports multiple languages such as C#, F#, and Visual Basic, while Actix is primarily focused on Rust as the programming language.
3. Concurrency Model: Actix utilizes an actor-based concurrency model, where each actor communicates asynchronously by passing messages, while .NET Core offers a multi-threaded approach for handling concurrency.
4. Community and Ecosystem: .NET Core has a larger community and ecosystem due to its backing by Microsoft, providing extensive documentation, libraries, and support, whereas Actix, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller but rapidly growing community.
5. Platform Independence: .NET Core is a cross-platform framework that can run on Windows, macOS, and Linux, ensuring portability, whereas Actix is primarily focused on running on Unix-like systems, although efforts are being made to enhance cross-platform compatibility.
6. Performance: Actix is known for its high-performance web server capabilities, making it suitable for applications that require handling a large number of concurrent connections, while .NET Core also offers good performance but may have more overhead due to its runtime environment.

In Summary, the key differences between .NET Core and Actix include their runtime environment, language support, concurrency model, community size, platform independence, and performance characteristics.