StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Actix vs NestJS

Actix vs NestJS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NestJS
NestJS
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.0K
Votes326
GitHub Stars73.3K
Forks8.1K
Actix
Actix
Stacks149
Followers224
Votes14
GitHub Stars9.1K
Forks666

Actix vs NestJS: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Actix and NestJS, highlighting key differences between the two frameworks. Actix is a Rust web framework that is known for its high performance and asynchronous programming capabilities. On the other hand, NestJS is a Node.js framework that embraces the TypeScript language and is designed to build scalable and maintainable applications.

  1. Language of Choice: Actix is written in Rust, a systems programming language that prioritizes speed, memory safety, and concurrency. NestJS, on the other hand, is written in TypeScript, a statically typed superset of JavaScript that offers better tooling and maintainability compared to plain JavaScript.

  2. Performance and Concurrency: Actix is renowned for its high performance and excellent concurrency support, making it ideal for building applications that require handling a large number of concurrent requests. NestJS, while still performant, may not match the same level of performance as Actix due to the overhead introduced by the Node.js runtime and JavaScript execution engine.

  3. Ecosystem and Community Support: Actix has a smaller but growing community compared to NestJS. Due to its relatively new adoption, Actix has a relatively smaller ecosystem and fewer available libraries and plugins compared to NestJS, which benefits from the extensive Node.js ecosystem and strong community support.

  4. Typescript Integration: While both Actix and NestJS can be used with TypeScript, NestJS has TypeScript as its primary language, and the framework encourages the use of strong typing and static analysis. This results in better development experience, code maintainability, and early bug detection for developers familiar with TypeScript.

  5. Architecture and Modularity: Actix follows a lightweight, minimalist design approach, providing developers with the freedom to choose the libraries and tools they prefer for their specific use cases. In contrast, NestJS follows an opinionated modular architecture that promotes code organization and separation of concerns. It provides built-in support for features like modules, decorators, dependency injection, and more.

  6. Community Adoption: NestJS has gained significant popularity and community adoption in recent years due to its alignment with the popular Node.js ecosystem and the strong JavaScript developer community. Actix, being a relatively new framework, is still in the process of wider community adoption, which might impact the availability of learning resources and community support.

In summary, Actix and NestJS differ in their choice of language, performance and concurrency capabilities, ecosystem and community support, TypeScript integration, architectural approach, and community adoption. Developers looking for a high-performing, Rust-based web framework with excellent concurrency support may prefer Actix, whereas those seeking a TypeScript-based framework with a strong ecosystem and community support might opt for NestJS.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NestJS, Actix

juan9222
juan9222

Jul 25, 2020

Needs advice

Hi there, I'm deciding the technology to use in my project.

I need to build software that has:

  • Login
  • Register
  • Main View (access to a user account, News, General Info, Business hours, software, and parts section).
  • Account Preferences.
  • Web Shop for Parts (Support, Download Sections, Ticket System).

The most critical functionality is a WebSocket that connects between a car that sends real-time data through serial communication, and a server performs diagnosis on the car and sends the results back to the user.

616k views616k
Comments
Louai
Louai

Full Stack Web Developer

May 15, 2020

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsTypeScriptTypeScriptExpressJSExpressJS

I'm planning with a small team to create an application which is a platform for restaurants. I'm on the backend almost alone currently. I'm going to use Node.js for that, and I'm very fond of TypeScript, and I worked before mostly with ExpressJS. The team may get bigger as the application becomes bigger and more successful, so I have the Scalability concern in mind now, and I was considering these options:

  1. Use Node+Express+Typescript
  2. Use Node+NestJs (which utilizes Typescript by default)

Option 2 is enticing to me because recently I came to love NestJS and it provides more scalability for the project and uses Typescript in the best way and uses Express under the hood. Also I come from an Angular 2 background, which I think is the best frontend framework (my opinion, and I know React quite well), which makes Nest feel familiar to me because of the similarity between Nest and Angular. Option 1 on the other hand uses Express which is a minimalist framework, very popular one, but it doesn't provide the same scalability and brings decision fatigue about what to combine with it and may not utilize Typescript in the best way. Yet, on the other hand, it is flexible and it may be easier to manipulate things in different ways with it. Another very important thing is that it would be easier in my view to hire Node developers with skills in Express than NestJs. The majority of Node developers are much more familiar with JavaScript and Express.

What is your advice and why? I would love to hear especially from developers who worked on both Express and Nest

549k views549k
Comments
Slimane
Slimane

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceonSpring BootSpring BootNestJSNestJSNode.jsNode.js

I am currently planning to build a project from scratch. I will be using Angular as front-end framework, but for the back-end I am not sure which framework to use between Spring Boot and NestJS. I have worked with Spring Boot before, but my new project contains a lot of I/O operations, in fact it will show a daily report. I thought about the new Spring Web Reactive Framework but given the idea that Node.js is the most popular on handling non blocking I/O I am planning to start learning NestJS since it is based on Angular philosophy and TypeScript which I am familiar with. Looking forward to hear from you dear Community.

917k views917k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NestJS
NestJS
Actix
Actix

Nest is a framework for building efficient, scalable Node.js server-side applications. It uses progressive JavaScript, is built with TypeScript (preserves compatibility with pure JavaScript) and combines elements of OOP (Object Oriented Programming), FP (Functional Programming), and FRP (Functional Reactive Programming). Under the hood, Nest makes use of Express, but also, provides compatibility with a wide range of other libraries, like e.g. Fastify, allowing for easy use of the myriad third-party plugins which are available.

It is a simple, pragmatic and extremely fast web framework for Rust. Actors are objects which encapsulate state and behavior, they communicate exclusively by exchanging messages.

Extensible - Gives you true flexibility by allowing use of any other libraries thanks to modular architecture.; Versatile - An adaptable ecosystem that is a fully-fledged backbone for all kinds of server-side applications.; Progressive - Takes advantage of latest JavaScript features, bringing design patterns and mature solutions to node.js world.
Type Safe; Feature Rich; Extensible; Blazingly Fast
Statistics
GitHub Stars
73.3K
GitHub Stars
9.1K
GitHub Forks
8.1K
GitHub Forks
666
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
149
Followers
3.0K
Followers
224
Votes
326
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 54
    Powerful but super friendly to work with
  • 42
    Fast development
  • 40
    Easy to understand documentation
  • 36
    Angular style syntax for the backend
  • 32
    NodeJS ecosystem
Cons
  • 10
    Difficult to debug
  • 10
    User base is small. Less help on Stackoverflow
  • 5
    Angular-like architecture
  • 3
    Javascript
  • 3
    Updates with breaking changes
Pros
  • 6
    Really really really fast
  • 3
    Very safe
  • 3
    Rust
  • 2
    Open source
Cons
  • 3
    Lots of unsafe code
Integrations
No integrations available
ExpressionEngine
ExpressionEngine
HTML5
HTML5
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to NestJS, Actix?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase