Overview

Next.js

Stacks8.0K

Followers5.1K

Votes330

GitHub Stars135.4K

Forks29.7K

Actix

Stacks148

Followers224

Votes14

GitHub Stars9.1K

Forks666

Actix vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Introduction: Actix and Next.js are two powerful web development frameworks used for building web applications. While Actix is a web framework for building high-performance, concurrent, and robust applications in Rust, Next.js is a minimalistic, opinionated framework for creating server-rendered React applications.

Language: One key difference between Actix and Next.js is the language they are built upon. Actix is based on Rust, known for its strong emphasis on safety and performance, while Next.js is built on top of JavaScript and specifically React, a popular front-end framework.
Concurrency Model: Actix distinguishes itself with its lightweight asynchronous actor system, providing high performance and scalability, ideal for handling massive workloads. In contrast, Next.js focuses more on server-side rendering and client-side hydration, making it simpler for developers to build interactive user interfaces with React.
Community Support: Another difference is the level of community support and adoption. Next.js has a large and active community backing it, with a plethora of plugins, libraries, and resources available for developers, making it easier to find solutions to common problems. While Actix also has a supportive community, it may not be as extensive as Next.js due to Rust's relatively smaller ecosystem.
Built-in Features: Actix offers a rich set of features out of the box, such as WebSocket support, routing, middleware, and more, making it a comprehensive solution for building web applications. On the other hand, Next.js focuses on simplicity and developer experience, providing features like automatic code splitting, hot module replacement, and server-side rendering to enhance productivity.
Deployment and Hosting: When it comes to deployment and hosting, Actix applications can be deployed as standalone binaries, benefiting from Rust's performance and static linking capabilities. In contrast, Next.js applications are typically deployed on Node.js servers or platforms like Vercel, which offer convenient deployment options but may not provide the same level of control as Actix.

In Summary, Actix and Next.js differ in their choice of language, concurrency model, community support, built-in features, and deployment options, catering to developers with varying preferences and requirements in web development.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

VitePress Frameworks

VitePress

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

2

Advice on Next.js, Actix

Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Next.js	Actix
Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.	It is a simple, pragmatic and extremely fast web framework for Rust. Actors are objects which encapsulate state and behavior, they communicate exclusively by exchanging messages.
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment	Type Safe; Feature Rich; Extensible; Blazingly Fast
Statistics
GitHub Stars 135.4K	GitHub Stars 9.1K
GitHub Forks 29.7K	GitHub Forks 666
Stacks 8.0K	Stacks 148
Followers 5.1K	Followers 224
Votes 330	Votes 14
Pros & Cons
Pros 51 Automatic server rendering and code splitting 44 Built with React 34 Easy setup 26 TypeScript 24 Universal JavaScript Cons 9 Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)	Pros 6 Really really really fast 3 Very safe 3 Rust 2 Open source Cons 3 Lots of unsafe code
Integrations
React	ExpressionEngine HTML5 Rust

What are some alternatives to Next.js, Actix?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.