Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AdonisJS vs Next.js: What are the differences?
Key Differences between AdonisJS and Next.js
AdonisJS and Next.js are both popular frameworks used for web development, but they have several key differences that set them apart from each other.
Architecture: AdonisJS is a full-stack MVC framework written in JavaScript or TypeScript, while Next.js is a React framework that focuses more on server-side rendering (SSR) and static site generation (SSG). AdonisJS follows a traditional MVC architecture, while Next.js follows a component-based architecture.
Language: AdonisJS is built with JavaScript or TypeScript as its primary language, while Next.js is built using JavaScript and specifically designed for React applications.
Routing: AdonisJS provides an expressive and powerful routing system with support for named routes, route parameters, route groups, and route resources. On the other hand, Next.js uses file-based routing, where each page is a React component and the file structure determines the routing.
Backend Integration: AdonisJS comes with built-in tools and features for backend development, such as ORM, database migration, and authentication, making it a suitable choice for building full-stack applications. Next.js, on the other hand, is primarily focused on the frontend and requires additional setups or integrations to work with backend technologies.
Server-side Rendering (SSR) vs Client-side Rendering (CSR): AdonisJS performs server-side rendering by default, meaning that the server generates the HTML content before sending it to the client. Next.js, on the other hand, supports both server-side rendering and client-side rendering, allowing developers to choose the rendering strategy based on their specific requirements.
Component Reusability: Next.js leverages React's component-based architecture, which promotes component reusability and modularity. This makes it easier to build complex UIs by reusing components. AdonisJS also supports component reusability but in a different context, mainly for server-side rendering and backend development.
In summary, AdonisJS is a full-stack MVC framework designed for backend development, while Next.js is a React framework focused on server-side rendering and frontend development. AdonisJS provides a robust backend infrastructure, while Next.js offers flexibility in rendering strategies and component reusability.
Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.
Hey guys,
My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!
Pros of AdonisJS
- Laravel like25
- Easy to learn24
- MVC23
- Beautiful code21
- ORM Mapper10
- Service Providers6
- Fast development5
- Easy to understand documentation4
- Typescript2
- Schema migrations1
- Ace command-line tool1
Pros of Next.js
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting49
- Built with React43
- Easy setup33
- TypeScript26
- Universal JavaScript24
- Zero setup22
- Static site generator21
- Simple deployment12
- Just JavaScript12
- Incremental static regeneration12
- Filesystem as an API10
- Frictionless development10
- Everything is a function9
- Well Documented9
- Has many examples and integrations8
- Testing8
- Isomorphic React applications7
- File based routing + hooks built in4
- Deployment2
- SEO1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AdonisJS
- Small community5
- Poor documentation1
Cons of Next.js
- Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)9