Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Airflow

1.7K
2.7K
+ 1
128
AWS Batch

90
250
+ 1
6
Add tool

AWS Batch vs Airflow: What are the differences?

Introduction

AWS Batch and Airflow are both popular tools used in data processing and workflow management. However, there are key differences between these two tools that set them apart in terms of their features and capabilities.

  1. Scalability: AWS Batch is a fully managed service that can dynamically scale the size and capacity of the compute resources used for data processing. It automatically provisions the necessary resources based on the job requirements, ensuring efficient utilization of resources. On the other hand, Airflow requires manual configuration and scaling of resources, making it less suitable for handling large-scale workloads without careful planning and management.

  2. Complexity: Airflow is a more feature-rich and complex tool compared to AWS Batch. It provides a robust framework for creating, scheduling, and executing workflows with support for various task dependencies, operators, and sensors. AWS Batch, on the other hand, is a simpler service that focuses primarily on batch processing jobs without the extensive workflow management capabilities offered by Airflow.

  3. Cost Structure: AWS Batch follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you are charged based on the compute resources used and the duration of the jobs. This provides cost flexibility, as you only pay for the resources consumed. Airflow, on the other hand, is an open-source tool that can be deployed on your own infrastructure or cloud environment. While Airflow itself is free, the cost of infrastructure and maintenance needs to be considered.

  4. Integration with AWS Services: As a service provided by AWS, AWS Batch seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as EC2, S3, and IAM. This allows for easy access to data and resources stored in the AWS ecosystem. Airflow, being a standalone open-source tool, requires manual integration with AWS services, which may require additional configuration and setup effort.

  5. Job Scheduling: Airflow provides fine-grained control over job scheduling and dependencies through its Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) concept. Users can define complex workflows with conditional branches and specify dependencies between tasks. In contrast, AWS Batch provides basic job scheduling capabilities but lacks the advanced workflows and dependencies management features offered by Airflow.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Airflow has a thriving community and a rich ecosystem of plugins, making it highly extensible and customizable. There are numerous community-contributed operators, sensors, and hooks available, allowing users to integrate with various external systems and services. AWS Batch, being a managed service, has a more limited ecosystem and may have less community support for customizations and integrations.

In summary, AWS Batch is a scalable, managed service focused on batch processing jobs with seamless integration with AWS services, while Airflow is a feature-rich, complex tool providing advanced workflow management capabilities with a thriving community and ecosystem. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements and complexity of your data processing and workflow needs.

Advice on Airflow and AWS Batch
Needs advice
on
AirflowAirflowLuigiLuigi
and
Apache SparkApache Spark

I am so confused. I need a tool that will allow me to go to about 10 different URLs to get a list of objects. Those object lists will be hundreds or thousands in length. I then need to get detailed data lists about each object. Those detailed data lists can have hundreds of elements that could be map/reduced somehow. My batch process dies sometimes halfway through which means hours of processing gone, i.e. time wasted. I need something like a directed graph that will keep results of successful data collection and allow me either pragmatically or manually to retry the failed ones some way (0 - forever) times. I want it to then process all the ones that have succeeded or been effectively ignored and load the data store with the aggregation of some couple thousand data-points. I know hitting this many endpoints is not a good practice but I can't put collectors on all the endpoints or anything like that. It is pretty much the only way to get the data.

See more
Replies (1)
Gilroy Gordon
Solution Architect at IGonics Limited · | 2 upvotes · 292.2K views
Recommends
on
CassandraCassandra

For a non-streaming approach:

You could consider using more checkpoints throughout your spark jobs. Furthermore, you could consider separating your workload into multiple jobs with an intermittent data store (suggesting cassandra or you may choose based on your choice and availability) to store results , perform aggregations and store results of those.

Spark Job 1 - Fetch Data From 10 URLs and store data and metadata in a data store (cassandra) Spark Job 2..n - Check data store for unprocessed items and continue the aggregation

Alternatively for a streaming approach: Treating your data as stream might be useful also. Spark Streaming allows you to utilize a checkpoint interval - https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/streaming-programming-guide.html#checkpointing

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Airflow
Pros of AWS Batch
  • 53
    Features
  • 14
    Task Dependency Management
  • 12
    Beautiful UI
  • 12
    Cluster of workers
  • 10
    Extensibility
  • 6
    Open source
  • 5
    Complex workflows
  • 5
    Python
  • 3
    Good api
  • 3
    Apache project
  • 3
    Custom operators
  • 2
    Dashboard
  • 3
    Containerized
  • 3
    Scalable

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Airflow
Cons of AWS Batch
  • 2
    Observability is not great when the DAGs exceed 250
  • 2
    Running it on kubernetes cluster relatively complex
  • 2
    Open source - provides minimum or no support
  • 1
    Logical separation of DAGs is not straight forward
  • 3
    More overhead than lambda
  • 1
    Image management

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Airflow?

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

What is AWS Batch?

It enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS. It dynamically provisions the optimal quantity and type of compute resources (e.g., CPU or memory optimized instances) based on the volume and specific resource requirements of the batch jobs submitted.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Airflow?
What companies use AWS Batch?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Airflow?
What tools integrate with AWS Batch?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to Airflow and AWS Batch?
Luigi
It is a Python module that helps you build complex pipelines of batch jobs. It handles dependency resolution, workflow management, visualization etc. It also comes with Hadoop support built in.
Apache NiFi
An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.
Jenkins
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
AWS Step Functions
AWS Step Functions makes it easy to coordinate the components of distributed applications and microservices using visual workflows. Building applications from individual components that each perform a discrete function lets you scale and change applications quickly.
Pachyderm
Pachyderm is an open source MapReduce engine that uses Docker containers for distributed computations.
See all alternatives