Akka HTTP vs LoopBack

Overview

LoopBack

Stacks285

Followers556

Votes33

GitHub Stars13.2K

Forks1.2K

Akka HTTP

Stacks54

Followers49

Votes0

Akka HTTP vs LoopBack: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing Akka HTTP and LoopBack, two popular frameworks for building web applications, there are key differences that developers should consider before choosing one for their project.

Architecture Design: Akka HTTP is based on the actor model, where actors communicate through messages, providing a highly scalable and concurrent system. In contrast, LoopBack follows a more traditional MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, making it easier for developers familiar with this pattern to understand and work with the framework.
Language Support: Akka HTTP is primarily designed for Scala and Java programming languages, whereas LoopBack has broader language support, including Node.js, JavaScript, and TypeScript. This versatility allows developers with different language preferences to effectively use LoopBack for their projects.
Concurrency Model: Akka HTTP has built-in support for handling asynchronous and concurrent requests efficiently using actors, making it well-suited for high-performance applications. On the other hand, LoopBack's concurrency model relies on asynchronous operations and event loops provided by Node.js, which may be more familiar to developers working with JavaScript environments.
Community and Ecosystem: Akka HTTP has a strong community backing with active contributors and libraries available for various use cases. In comparison, LoopBack benefits from being built on top of Express.js, a widely used web application framework for Node.js, offering a rich ecosystem of plugins and middleware that developers can leverage.
Deployment and Scaling: Akka HTTP's actor-based architecture simplifies deployment and scaling by allowing stateful actors to be distributed across multiple nodes easily. LoopBack, being based on Node.js, can also benefit from the horizontal scaling capabilities of Node.js applications when deploying to cloud platforms or server clusters.
API Development: LoopBack provides a more specialized focus on API development, offering features like automatic API explorer generation, OAuth integration, and strong support for creating RESTful APIs out of the box. Akka HTTP, while capable of building APIs, may require additional libraries or extensions to achieve similar API development conveniences.

In Summary, when choosing between Akka HTTP and LoopBack, developers should consider architecture design, language support, concurrency model, community and ecosystem, deployment and scaling capabilities, and API development features to determine the best fit for their web application project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

LoopBack	Akka HTTP
A highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables you to create dynamic end-to-end REST APIs with little or no coding. Connect to multiple data sources, write business logic in Node.js, glue on top of your existing services and data, connect using JS, iOS & Android SDKs.	The Akka HTTP modules implement a full server- and client-side HTTP stack on top of akka-actor and akka-stream. It’s not a web-framework but rather a more general toolkit for providing and consuming HTTP-based services. While interaction with a browser is of course also in scope it is not the primary focus of Akka HTTP.
A brand new core; OpenAPI spec driven REST API; GraphQL support	Full server- and client-side HTTP stack; Toolkit for providing and consuming HTTP-based services
Statistics
GitHub Stars 13.2K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 285	Stacks 54
Followers 556	Followers 49
Votes 33	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 11 Need a nodejs ReST-API, DB, AAA, Swagger? Then loopback 9 Easy Database Migration 6 Code generator 4 The future of API's 2 GraphQL Cons 7 Community is slow 1 Backward compatibility	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js TypeScript ExpressJS StrongLoop GraphQL	Java Scala

What are some alternatives to LoopBack, Akka HTTP?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Akka HTTP vs LoopBack: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing Akka HTTP and LoopBack, two popular frameworks for building web applications, there are key differences that developers should consider before choosing one for their project.

Architecture Design: Akka HTTP is based on the actor model, where actors communicate through messages, providing a highly scalable and concurrent system. In contrast, LoopBack follows a more traditional MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, making it easier for developers familiar with this pattern to understand and work with the framework.
Language Support: Akka HTTP is primarily designed for Scala and Java programming languages, whereas LoopBack has broader language support, including Node.js, JavaScript, and TypeScript. This versatility allows developers with different language preferences to effectively use LoopBack for their projects.
Concurrency Model: Akka HTTP has built-in support for handling asynchronous and concurrent requests efficiently using actors, making it well-suited for high-performance applications. On the other hand, LoopBack's concurrency model relies on asynchronous operations and event loops provided by Node.js, which may be more familiar to developers working with JavaScript environments.
Community and Ecosystem: Akka HTTP has a strong community backing with active contributors and libraries available for various use cases. In comparison, LoopBack benefits from being built on top of Express.js, a widely used web application framework for Node.js, offering a rich ecosystem of plugins and middleware that developers can leverage.
Deployment and Scaling: Akka HTTP's actor-based architecture simplifies deployment and scaling by allowing stateful actors to be distributed across multiple nodes easily. LoopBack, being based on Node.js, can also benefit from the horizontal scaling capabilities of Node.js applications when deploying to cloud platforms or server clusters.
API Development: LoopBack provides a more specialized focus on API development, offering features like automatic API explorer generation, OAuth integration, and strong support for creating RESTful APIs out of the box. Akka HTTP, while capable of building APIs, may require additional libraries or extensions to achieve similar API development conveniences.

Akka HTTP vs LoopBack

Overview