Alacritty vs Putty: What are the differences?

Introduction

The following markdown provides key differences between Alacritty and Putty.

1. Text Rendering: Alacritty utilizes GPU rendering, resulting in fast and smooth text rendering. On the other hand, Putty uses traditional CPU rendering, which may not be as efficient.
2. Cross-Platform Compatibility: Alacritty is compatible with major operating systems such as Windows, macOS, and Linux, while Putty is primarily designed for Windows-based systems.
3. Customizability: Alacritty offers a high level of customizability through YAML configuration files, allowing users to personalize various aspects of the terminal emulator. Meanwhile, Putty offers limited customization options and primarily relies on settings within the application.
4. Session Management: Putty supports session management, allowing users to save connection details and settings for quick and easy access to remote servers. This feature is not available in Alacritty, which focuses primarily on creating a lightweight and efficient terminal emulator.
5. SSH Support: Putty is widely known for its built-in SSH client, providing secure and encrypted remote access capabilities. While Alacritty can be used with an SSH client such as OpenSSH, it does not include native SSH support.
6. User Interface: Alacritty has a minimalistic user interface with a clean and simple design, offering a clutter-free terminal experience. On the other hand, Putty has a more detailed and traditional user interface with various options and settings accessible through menus.

In summary, Alacritty differs from Putty in terms of text rendering, cross-platform compatibility, customizability, session management, SSH support, and user interface.