Amazon Athena vs Apache Kylin: What are the differences?
## Introduction
Today, we will compare Amazon Athena and Apache Kylin, two popular technologies used for processing big data.
## 1. Scalability:
Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that scales automatically, handling tasks of all sizes efficiently. On the other hand, Apache Kylin is designed for extreme scalability and can process data in petabytes, making it more suitable for organizations dealing with enormous datasets.
## 2. Data Sources:
Amazon Athena primarily works with data stored in Amazon S3, while Apache Kylin supports multiple data sources such as Apache Hive, Apache HBase, and more, offering flexibility in choosing the data storage system.
## 3. Query Performance:
Amazon Athena is optimized for querying data quickly and efficiently using standard SQL, connecting directly to S3. In comparison, Apache Kylin utilizes pre-built OLAP cubes to provide sub-second query performance, making it ideal for complex analytical queries.
## 4. Cost:
Amazon Athena follows a pay-per-query pricing model, where users are billed based on the amount of data scanned during query execution. Apache Kylin, being an open-source tool, is cost-effective in terms of licensing fees but may require higher hardware resources for deployment and maintenance.
## 5. SQL Compatibility:
Both Amazon Athena and Apache Kylin support SQL queries, enabling users to leverage their existing SQL skills. However, the syntax and capabilities of SQL queries may vary slightly between the two technologies.
## 6. Deployment Complexity:
Amazon Athena's serverless architecture simplifies deployment as there is no infrastructure setup required. Conversely, Apache Kylin involves more setup and configuration to deploy the OLAP engine and build cubes, potentially requiring more expertise and resources for implementation.
In Summary, Amazon Athena and Apache Kylin differ in scalability, data sources, query performance, cost, SQL compatibility, and deployment complexity, catering to different needs in the big data processing domain.