StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. NoSQL Databases
  4. NOSQL Database As A Service
  5. Amazon DynamoDB vs MySQL

Amazon DynamoDB vs MySQL

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Stacks4.0K
Followers3.2K
Votes195
MySQL
MySQL
Stacks129.6K
Followers108.6K
Votes3.8K
GitHub Stars11.8K
Forks4.1K

Amazon DynamoDB vs MySQL: What are the differences?

Key differences between Amazon DynamoDB and MySQL

Amazon DynamoDB and MySQL are two popular database management systems, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Here are the key differences between them:

  1. Scalability: One major difference between DynamoDB and MySQL is scalability. DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database that automatically scales its resources to handle any level of traffic. It can handle petabytes of data and millions of read and write requests per second. In contrast, MySQL requires manual configuration and scaling to handle high levels of traffic and data volume.

  2. Data model: DynamoDB uses a key-value store data model, where each item in the database is uniquely identified by a primary key. It does not enforce a schema, allowing for flexible data models. On the other hand, MySQL uses a relational data model with tables and columns that enforce a predefined schema. This schema ensures data consistency and integrity.

  3. Consistency: DynamoDB offers eventual consistency by default, which means that data changes may take some time to propagate across all replicas. However, it also provides strong consistency as an option, guaranteeing that all replicas are immediately updated. In MySQL, strong consistency is the default behavior, ensuring that read operations always return the most up-to-date data.

  4. Performance: DynamoDB is designed for high-performance applications that require quick and predictable response times. It achieves this by replicating data across multiple servers in multiple availability zones. On the other hand, MySQL is known for its transactional capabilities and provides excellent performance for applications that require complex queries and joins.

  5. Cost: DynamoDB pricing is based on provisioned throughput and storage, which offers predictable costs but can be more expensive for highly variable workloads. MySQL can be deployed on a variety of infrastructure options, and the cost is primarily dependent on the chosen setup and configuration.

  6. Query capabilities: DynamoDB provides fast key-value lookup and limited support for secondary indexes. It does not support complex joins and SQL queries. In contrast, MySQL offers a rich set of query capabilities, including joins, aggregations, and complex filtering using SQL.

In summary, the key differences between Amazon DynamoDB and MySQL lie in their scalability, data model, consistency, performance, cost, and query capabilities. Choosing between these two databases depends on the specific requirements of the application and the trade-offs between scalability, flexibility, and ease of use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon DynamoDB, MySQL

Kyle
Kyle

Web Application Developer at Redacted DevWorks

Dec 3, 2019

DecidedonPostGISPostGIS

While there's been some very clever techniques that has allowed non-natively supported geo querying to be performed, it is incredibly slow in the long game and error prone at best.

MySQL finally introduced it's own GEO functions and special indexing operations for GIS type data. I prototyped with this, as MySQL is the most familiar database to me. But no matter what I did with it, how much tuning i'd give it, how much I played with it, the results would come back inconsistent.

It was very disappointing.

I figured, at this point, that SQL Server, being an enterprise solution authored by one of the biggest worldwide software developers in the world, Microsoft, might contain some decent GIS in it.

I was very disappointed.

Postgres is a Database solution i'm still getting familiar with, but I noticed it had no built in support for GIS. So I hilariously didn't pay it too much attention. That was until I stumbled upon PostGIS and my world changed forever.

449k views449k
Comments
Ido
Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

My data was inherently hierarchical, but there was not enough content in each level of the hierarchy to justify a relational DB (SQL) with a one-to-many approach. It was also far easier to share data between the frontend (Angular), backend (Node.js) and DB (MongoDB) as they all pass around JSON natively. This allowed me to skip the translation layer from relational to hierarchical. You do need to think about correct indexes in MongoDB, and make sure the objects have finite size. For instance, an object in your DB shouldn't have a property which is an array that grows over time, without limit. In addition, I did use MySQL for other types of data, such as a catalog of products which (a) has a lot of data, (b) flat and not hierarchical, (c) needed very fast queries.

575k views575k
Comments
Navraj
Navraj

CEO at SuPragma

Apr 16, 2020

Needs adviceonMySQLMySQLPostgreSQLPostgreSQL

I asked my last question incorrectly. Rephrasing it here.

I am looking for the most secure open source database for my project I'm starting: https://github.com/SuPragma/SuPragma/wiki

Which database is more secure? MySQL or PostgreSQL? Are there others I should be considering? Is it possible to change the encryption keys dynamically?

Thanks,

Raj

401k views401k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
MySQL
MySQL

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

Automated Storage Scaling – There is no limit to the amount of data you can store in a DynamoDB table, and the service automatically allocates more storage, as you store more data using the DynamoDB write APIs;Provisioned Throughput – When creating a table, simply specify how much request capacity you require. DynamoDB allocates dedicated resources to your table to meet your performance requirements, and automatically partitions data over a sufficient number of servers to meet your request capacity;Fully Distributed, Shared Nothing Architecture
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
11.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.1K
Stacks
4.0K
Stacks
129.6K
Followers
3.2K
Followers
108.6K
Votes
195
Votes
3.8K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Predictable performance and cost
  • 56
    Scalable
  • 35
    Native JSON Support
  • 21
    AWS Free Tier
  • 7
    Fast
Cons
  • 4
    Only sequential access for paginate data
  • 1
    Document Limit Size
  • 1
    Scaling
Pros
  • 800
    Sql
  • 679
    Free
  • 562
    Easy
  • 528
    Widely used
  • 490
    Open source
Cons
  • 16
    Owned by a company with their own agenda
  • 3
    Can't roll back schema changes
Integrations
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
SQLite
SQLite
Azure Database for MySQL
Azure Database for MySQL
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Amazon DynamoDB, MySQL?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase