StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Amazon EBS vs Amazon ElastiCache

Amazon EBS vs Amazon ElastiCache

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon EBS
Amazon EBS
Stacks650
Followers542
Votes82
Amazon ElastiCache
Amazon ElastiCache
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.0K
Votes151

Amazon EBS vs Amazon ElastiCache: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) and Amazon ElastiCache. Both of these services are provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) and are important for different purposes in cloud computing infrastructures.

  1. Data Storage vs. In-Memory Caching: The main difference between Amazon EBS and Amazon ElastiCache lies in their primary use cases. Amazon EBS is designed for data storage, serving as a persistent block-level storage volume for EC2 instances. On the other hand, Amazon ElastiCache is a fully managed in-memory caching service that helps improve the performance and scalability of web applications by alleviating the load on databases and disk-based storage.

  2. Persistence: Another significant difference between Amazon EBS and Amazon ElastiCache is in terms of persistence. Amazon EBS volumes are persistent, meaning that the data stored on them is retained even after the EC2 instance is stopped or terminated. In contrast, Amazon ElastiCache is not primarily designed for persistence, as it is focused on caching frequently accessed data in-memory for faster retrieval. The data stored in Amazon ElastiCache is not permanently stored and could be evicted from the cache depending on various factors.

  3. Storage Volume Types: Amazon EBS offers different types of storage volumes, including General Purpose SSD (GP2), Provisioned IOPS SSD (io1), Throughput Optimized HDD (st1), and Cold HDD (sc1). This variety of volume types allows users to choose the appropriate storage solution based on their workload requirements. On the other hand, Amazon ElastiCache is solely focused on in-memory caching and does not provide different types of storage volumes.

  4. Use of Protocols: Amazon EBS uses the network block device (NBD) protocol for communicating with EC2 instances. This protocol enables block-level storage access and allows for increased flexibility and compatibility with various operating systems. In contrast, Amazon ElastiCache uses standard memcached or Redis protocols for cache access, making it compatible with applications that can utilize these protocols.

  5. Cost Structure: There is a difference in the cost structure between Amazon EBS and Amazon ElastiCache. Amazon EBS charges users for the provisioned storage volume, I/O operations, and snapshot storage. On the other hand, Amazon ElastiCache pricing is based on the cache node types and the amount of cache memory utilized, with additional charges for data transfer and backup snapshots.

  6. Multi-Availability Zone (Multi-AZ) Support: Amazon EBS provides the option for creating multi-AZ volumes, which replicate the data across multiple Availability Zones for high availability and durability. This feature ensures that data is protected in case of an Availability Zone failure. On the other hand, Amazon ElastiCache does not support multi-AZ deployments, as it is primarily focused on caching data for performance improvement rather than high availability.

In summary, the key differences between Amazon EBS and Amazon ElastiCache are their primary use cases (data storage vs. in-memory caching), persistence (EBS is persistent while ElastiCache is not), storage volume types (EBS offers different types, ElastiCache does not), protocols used (EBS uses NBD while ElastiCache uses memcached or Redis), cost structure, and multi-AZ support (EBS supports, ElastiCache does not).

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Amazon EBS
Amazon EBS
Amazon ElastiCache
Amazon ElastiCache

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

ElastiCache improves the performance of web applications by allowing you to retrieve information from fast, managed, in-memory caches, instead of relying entirely on slower disk-based databases. ElastiCache supports Memcached and Redis.

Amazon EBS allows you to create storage volumes from 1 GB to 1 TB that can be mounted as devices by Amazon EC2 instances. Multiple volumes can be mounted to the same instance.;Amazon EBS enables you to provision a specific level of I/O performance if desired, by choosing a Provisioned IOPS volume. This allows you to predictably scale to thousands of IOPS per Amazon EC2 instance.;Storage volumes behave like raw, unformatted block devices, with user supplied device names and a block device interface. You can create a file system on top of Amazon EBS volumes, or use them in any other way you would use a block device (like a hard drive).;Amazon EBS volumes are placed in a specific Availability Zone, and can then be attached to instances also in that same Availability Zone.;Each storage volume is automatically replicated within the same Availability Zone. This prevents data loss due to failure of any single hardware component.;Amazon EBS also provides the ability to create point-in-time snapshots of volumes, which are persisted to Amazon S3. These snapshots can be used as the starting point for new Amazon EBS volumes, and protect data for long-term durability. The same snapshot can be used to instantiate as many volumes as you wish. These snapshots can be copied across AWS regions, making it easier to leverage multiple AWS regions for geographical expansion, data center migration and disaster recovery.;AWS also enables you to create new volumes from AWS hosted public data sets.;Amazon CloudWatch exposes performance metrics for EBS volumes, giving you insight into bandwidth, throughput, latency, and queue depth. The metrics are accessible via the AWS CloudWatch API or the AWS Management Console. For more details, see Amazon CloudWatch.
Support for two engines: Memcached and Redis;Ease of management via the AWS Management Console. With a few clicks you can configure and launch instances for the engine you wish to use.;Compatibility with the specific engine protocol. This means most of the client libraries will work with the respective engines they were built for - no additional changes or tweaking required.;Detailed monitoring statistics for the engine nodes at no extra cost via Amazon CloudWatch;Pay only for the resources you consume based on node hours used
Statistics
Stacks
650
Stacks
1.3K
Followers
542
Followers
1.0K
Votes
82
Votes
151
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 36
    Point-in-time snapshots
  • 27
    Data reliability
  • 19
    Configurable i/o performance
Pros
  • 58
    Redis
  • 32
    High-performance
  • 26
    Backed by amazon
  • 21
    Memcached
  • 14
    Elastic

What are some alternatives to Amazon EBS, Amazon ElastiCache?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

MemCachier

MemCachier

MemCachier provides an easy and powerful managed caching solution for all your performance and scalability needs. It works with the ubiquitous memcache protocol so your favourite language and framework already supports it.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Memcached Cloud

Memcached Cloud

Memcached Cloud is a fully-managed service for running your Memcached in a reliable and fail-safe manner. Your dataset is constantly replicated, so if a node fails, an auto-switchover mechanism guarantees data is served without interruption. Memcached Cloud provides various data persistence options as well as remote backups for disaster recovery purposes.

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase