Amazon EBS vs SQLite: What are the differences?
Developers describe Amazon EBS as "Block level storage volumes for use with Amazon EC2 instances". Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage. On the other hand, SQLite is detailed as "A software library that implements a self-contained, serverless, zero-configuration, transactional SQL database engine". SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.
Amazon EBS can be classified as a tool in the "Cloud Storage" category, while SQLite is grouped under "Databases".
"Point-in-time snapshots" is the primary reason why developers consider Amazon EBS over the competitors, whereas "Lightweight" was stated as the key factor in picking SQLite.
According to the StackShare community, SQLite has a broader approval, being mentioned in 314 company stacks & 477 developers stacks; compared to Amazon EBS, which is listed in 179 company stacks and 47 developer stacks.