Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon S3 vs Azure Storage vs Google Cloud Storage: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Key differences between Amazon S3, Azure Storage, and Google Cloud Storage:
1. **Storage Options**: Amazon S3 allows users to choose between different storage classes based on access frequency, while Azure Storage offers Blob Storage with options like hot, cool, and archive tiers for data optimization. Google Cloud Storage provides Multi-Regional, Regional, Nearline, and Coldline storage classes for cost-effective data management.
2. **Pricing Structure**: Amazon S3 charges separately for storage, requests, and data transfer, with pricing varying across regions. Azure Storage offers a more granular pricing model, including charges for storage, data retrieval, transactions, and redundancy options. Google Cloud Storage has a simplified pricing structure with data storage and network egress fees.
3. **Encryption and Security Features**: Amazon S3 supports server-side encryption, client-side encryption, and integration with AWS Key Management Service for enhanced security. Azure Storage provides encryption at rest, in transit, and options for managing encryption keys through Azure Key Vault. Google Cloud Storage offers server-side encryption with Google-managed or customer-supplied keys for securing data.
4. **Integration with Other Services**: Amazon S3 integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like AWS Lambda, Glacier, and IAM for automated workflows and access control. Azure Storage integrates well with Azure functions, Azure Data Lake, and Active Directory for enhanced functionalities. Google Cloud Storage can be easily integrated with Google BigQuery, Compute Engine, and Cloud Functions for streamlined data processing and analysis.
5. **Data Transfer Speed and Availability**: Amazon S3 ensures high availability and reliability with its global infrastructure, offering consistent performance for data transfers. Azure Storage guarantees low latency and high throughput for data operations through its scalable platform and global network. Google Cloud Storage offers parallel uploads and downloads for improved data transfer speeds and high availability with its multi-region and dual-region options.
6. **Management Tools and Monitoring Capabilities**: Amazon S3 provides a user-friendly console, SDKs, and third-party tools for managing storage resources efficiently. Azure Storage offers Azure Portal, PowerShell, and Azure CLI for monitoring and managing storage accounts effectively. Google Cloud Storage provides Cloud Console, gsutil tool, and integration with Stackdriver for monitoring storage usage and performance metrics.
In Summary, Amazon S3, Azure Storage, and Google Cloud Storage differ in storage options, pricing structures, encryption/security features, integration capabilities, data transfer speeds, and management tools/monitoring capabilities.
Hello! I have a mobile app with nearly 100k MAU, and I want to add a cloud file storage service to my app.
My app will allow users to store their image, video, and audio files and retrieve them to their device when necessary.
I have already decided to use PHP & Laravel as my backend, and I use Contabo VPS. Now, I need an object storage service for my app, and my options are:
Amazon S3 : It sounds to me like the best option but the most expensive. Closest to my users (MENA Region) for other services, I will have to go to Europe. Not sure how important this is?
DigitalOcean Spaces : Seems like my best option for price/service, but I am still not sure
Wasabi: the best price (6 USD/MONTH/TB) and free bandwidth, but I am not sure if it fits my needs as I want to allow my users to preview audio and video files. They don't recommend their service for streaming videos.
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage: Good price but not sure about them.
There is also the self-hosted s3 compatible option, but I am not sure about that.
Any thoughts will be helpful. Also, if you think I should post in a different sub, please tell me.
If pricing is the issue i'd suggest you use digital ocean, but if its not use amazon was digital oceans API is s3 compatible
Hello Mohammad, I am using : Cloudways >> AWS >> Bahrain for last 2 years. This is best I consider out of my 10 year research on Laravel hosting.
Minio is a free and open source object storage system. It can be self-hosted and is S3 compatible. During the early stage it would save cost and allow us to move to a different object storage when we scale up. It is also fast and easy to set up. This is very useful during development since it can be run on localhost.
We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.
We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.
Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.
We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.
That's why we switched to S3 that just works.
Pros of Amazon S3
- Reliable590
- Scalable492
- Cheap456
- Simple & easy329
- Many sdks83
- Logical30
- Easy Setup13
- REST API11
- 1000+ POPs11
- Secure6
- Easy4
- Plug and play4
- Web UI for uploading files3
- Faster on response2
- Flexible2
- GDPR ready2
- Easy to use1
- Plug-gable1
- Easy integration with CloudFront1
Pros of Azure Storage
- All-in-one storage solution24
- Pay only for data used regardless of disk size15
- Shared drive mapping9
- Cost-effective2
- Cheapest hot and cloud storage2
Pros of Google Cloud Storage
- Scalable28
- Cheap19
- Reliable14
- Easy9
- Chealp3
- More praticlal and easy2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon S3
- Permissions take some time to get right7
- Requires a credit card6
- Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly6
- Complex to set up3
Cons of Azure Storage
- Direct support is not provided by Azure storage2