Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon S3 vs DigitalOcean Spaces: What are the differences?
Introduction:
In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Amazon S3 and DigitalOcean Spaces, two popular cloud storage services. Both services offer reliable and scalable object storage solutions, but they have some distinct features that set them apart.
Pricing Model: Amazon S3 offers a usage-based pricing model, charging customers for the number of requests made, the amount of data stored, and the data transfer out of the storage. On the other hand, DigitalOcean Spaces adopts a simplified and predictable pricing structure, which includes a fixed monthly cost based on the storage capacity and the data transfer.
Storage Durability and Availability: Amazon S3 guarantees 99.999999999% durability for objects stored in their infrastructure and provides 99.99% availability. It achieves this level of durability by automatically replicating data across multiple geographically diverse locations. DigitalOcean Spaces offers a 99.99% uptime SLA, ensuring reliable access to stored data.
Data Transfer and Content Delivery Network (CDN): Amazon S3 provides a global network of edge locations powered by Amazon CloudFront, their content delivery network. This allows for fast and efficient content delivery to end-users across the globe. DigitalOcean Spaces, on the other hand, does not have its own CDN. However, it integrates seamlessly with third-party CDNs like Cloudflare and Fastly.
Scalability and Performance: Amazon S3 can handle virtually unlimited storage capacity and concurrent requests, making it suitable for large-scale applications. It also offers faster transfer speeds with features like AWS Transfer Acceleration. DigitalOcean Spaces, while highly scalable, has some limitations in terms of maximum object size and concurrent requests. However, it still provides high-performance storage for most applications.
Integration with Other Services: Amazon S3 has an extensive ecosystem of services and integrations within the AWS platform, making it easy to build complex architectures and workflows. It integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like Lambda, Glacier, and Redshift. DigitalOcean Spaces, although it has fewer integrations, provides straightforward integration with other DigitalOcean services like Droplets and Kubernetes.
Management and Access Control: Amazon S3 offers fine-grained access control and permissions management through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), allowing users to set up complex access policies. DigitalOcean Spaces provides simple access control mechanisms but lacks the advanced features and flexibility offered by AWS IAM.
In summary, while both Amazon S3 and DigitalOcean Spaces offer reliable and scalable object storage solutions, they differ in terms of pricing model, storage durability and availability, data transfer and CDN integration, scalability and performance, integration with other services, and management and access control capabilities.
Hello! I have a mobile app with nearly 100k MAU, and I want to add a cloud file storage service to my app.
My app will allow users to store their image, video, and audio files and retrieve them to their device when necessary.
I have already decided to use PHP & Laravel as my backend, and I use Contabo VPS. Now, I need an object storage service for my app, and my options are:
Amazon S3 : It sounds to me like the best option but the most expensive. Closest to my users (MENA Region) for other services, I will have to go to Europe. Not sure how important this is?
DigitalOcean Spaces : Seems like my best option for price/service, but I am still not sure
Wasabi: the best price (6 USD/MONTH/TB) and free bandwidth, but I am not sure if it fits my needs as I want to allow my users to preview audio and video files. They don't recommend their service for streaming videos.
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage: Good price but not sure about them.
There is also the self-hosted s3 compatible option, but I am not sure about that.
Any thoughts will be helpful. Also, if you think I should post in a different sub, please tell me.
If pricing is the issue i'd suggest you use digital ocean, but if its not use amazon was digital oceans API is s3 compatible
Hello Mohammad, I am using : Cloudways >> AWS >> Bahrain for last 2 years. This is best I consider out of my 10 year research on Laravel hosting.
Minio is a free and open source object storage system. It can be self-hosted and is S3 compatible. During the early stage it would save cost and allow us to move to a different object storage when we scale up. It is also fast and easy to set up. This is very useful during development since it can be run on localhost.
We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.
That's why we switched to S3 that just works.
Pros of Amazon S3
- Reliable590
- Scalable492
- Cheap456
- Simple & easy329
- Many sdks83
- Logical30
- Easy Setup13
- REST API11
- 1000+ POPs11
- Secure6
- Easy4
- Plug and play4
- Web UI for uploading files3
- Faster on response2
- Flexible2
- GDPR ready2
- Easy to use1
- Plug-gable1
- Easy integration with CloudFront1
Pros of DigitalOcean Spaces
- Easy setup3
- Cheap2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon S3
- Permissions take some time to get right7
- Requires a credit card6
- Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly6
- Complex to set up3