Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage vs Minio

Overview

Amazon S3

Stacks55.1K

Followers40.2K

Votes2.0K

Google Cloud Storage

Stacks2.0K

Followers1.2K

Votes75

Minio

Stacks637

Followers670

Votes43

GitHub Stars57.8K

Forks6.4K

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage vs Minio: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Data Consistency**: Amazon S3 offers eventual consistency model, which means that changes made to objects may not be immediately visible. On the other hand, Google Cloud Storage and Minio provide strong consistency, ensuring that all reads reflect the latest write.
2. **Pricing**: Amazon S3 has more complicated pricing models with various factors affecting the cost, including storage class, request rates, and data transfer. In contrast, Google Cloud Storage offers simplified and predictable pricing, making it easier for users to estimate costs. Minio, being open-source, eliminates any costs associated with storage, access, and data transfer.
3. **API Compatibility**: Amazon S3 has a proprietary API that is widely supported and used by many applications. Google Cloud Storage also supports the same API, making it easy for users to migrate between the two services. Minio, being compatible with the S3 API, allows for seamless integration with applications built for Amazon S3.
4. **Object Versioning**: Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage support object versioning, allowing users to preserve, retrieve, and restore every version of every object stored. Minio also supports object versioning, providing users with the ability to track changes to their data over time.
5. **Data Transfer Acceleration**: Amazon S3 offers a feature called Transfer Acceleration that uses Amazon CloudFront's globally distributed edge locations to accelerate file transfers. Google Cloud Storage provides a similar feature called Cloud Storage Transfer Service, which simplifies transferring large amounts of data to Google Cloud Storage. Minio, although lacking a built-in data transfer acceleration feature, can easily integrate with third-party solutions for faster data transfers.
6. **Client Libraries and SDKs**: Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage offer a wide range of client libraries and SDKs in various programming languages, making it easy for developers to interact with the services. Minio also provides client libraries and SDKs, ensuring compatibility with popular programming languages and frameworks for seamless integration.

In Summary, Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, and Minio differ in terms of data consistency, pricing, API compatibility, object versioning, data transfer acceleration, and client library availability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, Minio

Mohammad

Aug 30, 2020

Needs adviceon

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

PHP

Laravel

Hello! I have a mobile app with nearly 100k MAU, and I want to add a cloud file storage service to my app.

My app will allow users to store their image, video, and audio files and retrieve them to their device when necessary.

I have already decided to use PHP & Laravel as my backend, and I use Contabo VPS. Now, I need an object storage service for my app, and my options are:

Amazon S3 : It sounds to me like the best option but the most expensive. Closest to my users (MENA Region) for other services, I will have to go to Europe. Not sure how important this is?
DigitalOcean Spaces : Seems like my best option for price/service, but I am still not sure
Wasabi: the best price (6 USD/MONTH/TB) and free bandwidth, but I am not sure if it fits my needs as I want to allow my users to preview audio and video files. They don't recommend their service for streaming videos.
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage: Good price but not sure about them.
There is also the self-hosted s3 compatible option, but I am not sure about that.

Any thoughts will be helpful. Also, if you think I should post in a different sub, please tell me.

180k views180k

Comments

Dalton

Oct 23, 2020

Decided

Minio is a free and open source object storage system. It can be self-hosted and is S3 compatible. During the early stage it would save cost and allow us to move to a different object storage when we scale up. It is also fast and easy to set up. This is very useful during development since it can be run on localhost.

143k views143k

Comments

Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon S3	Google Cloud Storage	Minio
Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web	Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.	Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License
Write, read, and delete objects containing from 1 byte to 5 terabytes of data each. The number of objects you can store is unlimited.;Each object is stored in a bucket and retrieved via a unique, developer-assigned key.;A bucket can be stored in one of several Regions. You can choose a Region to optimize for latency, minimize costs, or address regulatory requirements. Amazon S3 is currently available in the US Standard, US West (Oregon), US West (Northern California), EU (Ireland), Asia Pacific (Singapore), Asia Pacific (Tokyo), Asia Pacific (Sydney), South America (Sao Paulo), and GovCloud (US) Regions. The US Standard Region automatically routes requests to facilities in Northern Virginia or the Pacific Northwest using network maps.;Objects stored in a Region never leave the Region unless you transfer them out. For example, objects stored in the EU (Ireland) Region never leave the EU.;Authentication mechanisms are provided to ensure that data is kept secure from unauthorized access. Objects can be made private or public, and rights can be granted to specific users.;Options for secure data upload/download and encryption of data at rest are provided for additional data protection.;Uses standards-based REST and SOAP interfaces designed to work with any Internet-development toolkit.;Built to be flexible so that protocol or functional layers can easily be added. The default download protocol is HTTP. A BitTorrent protocol interface is provided to lower costs for high-scale distribution.;Provides functionality to simplify manageability of data through its lifetime. Includes options for segregating data by buckets, monitoring and controlling spend, and automatically archiving data to even lower cost storage options. These options can be easily administered from the Amazon S3 Management Console.;Reliability backed with the Amazon S3 Service Level Agreement.	High Capacity and Scalability;Strong Data Consistency;Google Developers Console Projects;Bucket Locations;REST APIS;OAuth 2.0 Authentication;Authenticated Browser Downloads;Google Account Support for Sharing	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 57.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 6.4K
Stacks 55.1K	Stacks 2.0K	Stacks 637
Followers 40.2K	Followers 1.2K	Followers 670
Votes 2.0K	Votes 75	Votes 43
Pros & Cons
Pros 590 Reliable 492 Scalable 456 Cheap 329 Simple & easy 83 Many sdks Cons 7 Permissions take some time to get right 6 Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly 6 Requires a credit card 3 Complex to set up	Pros 28 Scalable 19 Cheap 14 Reliable 9 Easy 3 Chealp	Pros 10 Store and Serve Resumes & Job Description PDF, Backups 8 S3 Compatible 4 Open Source 4 Simple 3 Encryption and Tamper-Proof Cons 3 Deletion of huge buckets is not possible

What are some alternatives to Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, Minio?

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

DigitalOcean Block Storage

Add more storage space, mix and match compute and storage to suit your database, file storage, application, service, mobile, and backup needs.

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

It is a generic cloud storage. You can use it from any computer, any operating system or any cloud storage purpose. You can manage and store large amounts of media files using this service

Related Comparisons

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage vs Minio: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Data Consistency**: Amazon S3 offers eventual consistency model, which means that changes made to objects may not be immediately visible. On the other hand, Google Cloud Storage and Minio provide strong consistency, ensuring that all reads reflect the latest write.
2. **Pricing**: Amazon S3 has more complicated pricing models with various factors affecting the cost, including storage class, request rates, and data transfer. In contrast, Google Cloud Storage offers simplified and predictable pricing, making it easier for users to estimate costs. Minio, being open-source, eliminates any costs associated with storage, access, and data transfer.
3. **API Compatibility**: Amazon S3 has a proprietary API that is widely supported and used by many applications. Google Cloud Storage also supports the same API, making it easy for users to migrate between the two services. Minio, being compatible with the S3 API, allows for seamless integration with applications built for Amazon S3.
4. **Object Versioning**: Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage support object versioning, allowing users to preserve, retrieve, and restore every version of every object stored. Minio also supports object versioning, providing users with the ability to track changes to their data over time.
5. **Data Transfer Acceleration**: Amazon S3 offers a feature called Transfer Acceleration that uses Amazon CloudFront's globally distributed edge locations to accelerate file transfers. Google Cloud Storage provides a similar feature called Cloud Storage Transfer Service, which simplifies transferring large amounts of data to Google Cloud Storage. Minio, although lacking a built-in data transfer acceleration feature, can easily integrate with third-party solutions for faster data transfers.
6. **Client Libraries and SDKs**: Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage offer a wide range of client libraries and SDKs in various programming languages, making it easy for developers to interact with the services. Minio also provides client libraries and SDKs, ensuring compatibility with popular programming languages and frameworks for seamless integration.

In Summary, Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, and Minio differ in terms of data consistency, pricing, API compatibility, object versioning, data transfer acceleration, and client library availability.

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage vs Minio

Overview