StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Amazon S3 vs Redis

Amazon S3 vs Redis

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Stacks55.1K
Followers40.2K
Votes2.0K
Redis
Redis
Stacks61.9K
Followers46.5K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars42
Forks6

Amazon S3 vs Redis: What are the differences?

Introduction

Amazon S3 and Redis are both widely used technologies for different purposes. Amazon S3 is primarily a cloud-based storage service, while Redis is an in-memory data structure store. Here are the key differences between the two:

  1. Data Storage: One of the primary differences between Amazon S3 and Redis is the way they store data. Amazon S3 is designed for long-term storage of large amounts of data, making it suitable for static file storage and backups. On the other hand, Redis is an in-memory data store, which means it primarily stores data in RAM, allowing for fast and efficient access.

  2. Data Retrieval: When it comes to retrieving data, Redis has an advantage over Amazon S3. Redis stores data in RAM, which enables extremely low-latency access to the data. On the other hand, Amazon S3 requires retrieving data from disk, which can introduce some latency, especially when dealing with large amounts of data.

  3. Data Structure Support: Redis offers a wide variety of data structures that can be stored and manipulated, such as strings, lists, sets, and sorted sets. This makes it suitable for building complex data models and performing operations directly on the data. Amazon S3, on the other hand, primarily focuses on storing and retrieving files, so it does not provide native support for data manipulation.

  4. Scalability: Both Amazon S3 and Redis are designed to be highly scalable, but they achieve scalability in different ways. Amazon S3 is a distributed storage system that automatically handles the storage and replication of data across multiple servers. Redis, on the other hand, can be scaled horizontally by adding multiple instances and using techniques like sharding to distribute the data across those instances.

  5. Ease of Use: When it comes to ease of use, Amazon S3 has a higher level of abstraction, making it generally easier to use for storage purposes. It provides a simple interface for uploading and downloading files, and also integrates well with other AWS services. Redis, on the other hand, requires more knowledge and expertise to set up and use effectively, especially when it comes to managing data models and performing complex operations.

  6. Data Persistence: Redis provides options for data persistence, allowing you to save the data to disk and recover it in case of server reboots or failures. Amazon S3 also provides durability and high availability for data, but it does not offer the same level of persistence as Redis. In Amazon S3, the data is stored redundantly across multiple servers, ensuring durability, but there is no built-in mechanism for persistent storage within a single instance.

In summary, Amazon S3 is a cloud storage service designed for long-term storage of large volumes of data, while Redis is an in-memory data structure store optimized for fast data access and manipulation. They differ in terms of data storage, retrieval, supported data structures, scalability, ease of use, and data persistence.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon S3, Redis

Mohammad
Mohammad

Aug 30, 2020

Needs adviceonBackblaze B2 Cloud StorageBackblaze B2 Cloud StoragePHPPHPLaravelLaravel

Hello! I have a mobile app with nearly 100k MAU, and I want to add a cloud file storage service to my app.

My app will allow users to store their image, video, and audio files and retrieve them to their device when necessary.

I have already decided to use PHP & Laravel as my backend, and I use Contabo VPS. Now, I need an object storage service for my app, and my options are:

  • Amazon S3 : It sounds to me like the best option but the most expensive. Closest to my users (MENA Region) for other services, I will have to go to Europe. Not sure how important this is?

  • DigitalOcean Spaces : Seems like my best option for price/service, but I am still not sure

  • Wasabi: the best price (6 USD/MONTH/TB) and free bandwidth, but I am not sure if it fits my needs as I want to allow my users to preview audio and video files. They don't recommend their service for streaming videos.

  • Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage: Good price but not sure about them.

  • There is also the self-hosted s3 compatible option, but I am not sure about that.

Any thoughts will be helpful. Also, if you think I should post in a different sub, please tell me.

180k views180k
Comments
Dalton
Dalton

Oct 23, 2020

Decided

Minio is a free and open source object storage system. It can be self-hosted and is S3 compatible. During the early stage it would save cost and allow us to move to a different object storage when we scale up. It is also fast and easy to set up. This is very useful during development since it can be run on localhost.

143k views143k
Comments
Gabriel
Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Redis
Redis

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

Write, read, and delete objects containing from 1 byte to 5 terabytes of data each. The number of objects you can store is unlimited.;Each object is stored in a bucket and retrieved via a unique, developer-assigned key.;A bucket can be stored in one of several Regions. You can choose a Region to optimize for latency, minimize costs, or address regulatory requirements. Amazon S3 is currently available in the US Standard, US West (Oregon), US West (Northern California), EU (Ireland), Asia Pacific (Singapore), Asia Pacific (Tokyo), Asia Pacific (Sydney), South America (Sao Paulo), and GovCloud (US) Regions. The US Standard Region automatically routes requests to facilities in Northern Virginia or the Pacific Northwest using network maps.;Objects stored in a Region never leave the Region unless you transfer them out. For example, objects stored in the EU (Ireland) Region never leave the EU.;Authentication mechanisms are provided to ensure that data is kept secure from unauthorized access. Objects can be made private or public, and rights can be granted to specific users.;Options for secure data upload/download and encryption of data at rest are provided for additional data protection.;Uses standards-based REST and SOAP interfaces designed to work with any Internet-development toolkit.;Built to be flexible so that protocol or functional layers can easily be added. The default download protocol is HTTP. A BitTorrent protocol interface is provided to lower costs for high-scale distribution.;Provides functionality to simplify manageability of data through its lifetime. Includes options for segregating data by buckets, monitoring and controlling spend, and automatically archiving data to even lower cost storage options. These options can be easily administered from the Amazon S3 Management Console.;Reliability backed with the Amazon S3 Service Level Agreement.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
42
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6
Stacks
55.1K
Stacks
61.9K
Followers
40.2K
Followers
46.5K
Votes
2.0K
Votes
3.9K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 590
    Reliable
  • 492
    Scalable
  • 456
    Cheap
  • 329
    Simple & easy
  • 83
    Many sdks
Cons
  • 7
    Permissions take some time to get right
  • 6
    Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly
  • 6
    Requires a credit card
  • 3
    Complex to set up
Pros
  • 888
    Performance
  • 542
    Super fast
  • 514
    Ease of use
  • 444
    In-memory cache
  • 324
    Advanced key-value cache
Cons
  • 15
    Cannot query objects directly
  • 3
    No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
  • 1
    No WAL

What are some alternatives to Amazon S3, Redis?

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase