Amazon S3 vs Tardigrade

Overview

Amazon S3

Stacks55.1K

Followers40.2K

Votes2.0K

Tardigrade

Stacks1

Followers16

Votes0

Amazon S3 vs Tardigrade: What are the differences?

Amazon S3 and Tardigrade are both cloud storage solutions, but they have key differences in terms of architecture, pricing, security, durability, data privacy, and decentralized storage.

Architecture: Amazon S3 is a centralized cloud storage solution offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It relies on a network of data centers owned and managed by Amazon. In contrast, Tardigrade is a decentralized storage platform that leverages peer-to-peer technology. It utilizes the spare storage capacity of thousands of independent storage nodes distributed globally to store and retrieve data.
Pricing: Amazon S3 follows a traditional pricing model based on storage usage, data transfer, and requests. Customers pay for the amount of data stored, data transferred in and out, and the number of requests made. Tardigrade offers a more cost-effective pricing structure. It implements a token-based system, where storage node operators are paid for their storage and bandwidth using the native cryptocurrency called Storj. This model generally reduces costs for the end-user.
Security: Both Amazon S3 and Tardigrade offer robust security measures. Amazon S3 provides access controls, encrypted storage, and integration with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM). On the other hand, Tardigrade encrypts data both in-transit and at-rest, utilizing client-side encryption. It also incorporates erasure coding and distributed redundancy to ensure data durability and integrity.
Durability: Amazon S3 ensures high durability by distributing data across multiple availability zones within a region. It offers durability durability of 99.999999999% (11 nines). Tardigrade achieves durability by dividing files into smaller chunks, encrypting and distributing them across a global network of storage nodes, ensuring 99.9999999999% (12 nines) durability.
Data Privacy: With Amazon S3, data privacy is subject to the terms and conditions agreed upon in the AWS customer agreement. Some customers may have concerns about data privacy due to the centralization of the service. Tardigrade places a strong emphasis on data privacy. Each file stored on Tardigrade is shredded into encrypted pieces, and only the end-user holds the decryption keys. This ensures that data is secure and private, even from the storage node operators.
Decentralized Storage: The key difference between Amazon S3 and Tardigrade lies in their approach to storage. Amazon S3 relies on centralized data centers owned by Amazon, while Tardigrade utilizes a global network of independent storage nodes. This decentralized approach makes Tardigrade more resilient to failures and censorship, as data is not controlled by a single entity.

In Summary, Amazon S3 is a centralized cloud storage solution offered by AWS, while Tardigrade is a decentralized storage platform that utilizes spare storage capacity from independent nodes. Tardigrade offers cost-effective pricing, enhanced data privacy, and higher durability due to its decentralized architecture.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Amazon S3, Tardigrade

Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon S3	Tardigrade
Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web	It is the enterprise, production-ready version of storjproject's decentralized cloud storage network. Ridiculously resilient, highly distributed. It is the perfect alternative to Amazon S3 -- in fact, it's S3 compatible so you can build your product using it as your backend storage layer without any issues.
Write, read, and delete objects containing from 1 byte to 5 terabytes of data each. The number of objects you can store is unlimited.;Each object is stored in a bucket and retrieved via a unique, developer-assigned key.;A bucket can be stored in one of several Regions. You can choose a Region to optimize for latency, minimize costs, or address regulatory requirements. Amazon S3 is currently available in the US Standard, US West (Oregon), US West (Northern California), EU (Ireland), Asia Pacific (Singapore), Asia Pacific (Tokyo), Asia Pacific (Sydney), South America (Sao Paulo), and GovCloud (US) Regions. The US Standard Region automatically routes requests to facilities in Northern Virginia or the Pacific Northwest using network maps.;Objects stored in a Region never leave the Region unless you transfer them out. For example, objects stored in the EU (Ireland) Region never leave the EU.;Authentication mechanisms are provided to ensure that data is kept secure from unauthorized access. Objects can be made private or public, and rights can be granted to specific users.;Options for secure data upload/download and encryption of data at rest are provided for additional data protection.;Uses standards-based REST and SOAP interfaces designed to work with any Internet-development toolkit.;Built to be flexible so that protocol or functional layers can easily be added. The default download protocol is HTTP. A BitTorrent protocol interface is provided to lower costs for high-scale distribution.;Provides functionality to simplify manageability of data through its lifetime. Includes options for segregating data by buckets, monitoring and controlling spend, and automatically archiving data to even lower cost storage options. These options can be easily administered from the Amazon S3 Management Console.;Reliability backed with the Amazon S3 Service Level Agreement.	S3-Compatible & Lightyears Ahead; Secure by Default; Globally Distributed; Built with Developers in Mind
Statistics
Stacks 55.1K	Stacks 1
Followers 40.2K	Followers 16
Votes 2.0K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 590 Reliable 492 Scalable 456 Cheap 329 Simple & easy 83 Many sdks Cons 7 Permissions take some time to get right 6 Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly 6 Requires a credit card 3 Complex to set up	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	.NET Swift C# Node.js Python Golang Xamarin

What are some alternatives to Amazon S3, Tardigrade?

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

Related Comparisons

Amazon S3 vs Tardigrade: What are the differences?

Amazon S3 and Tardigrade are both cloud storage solutions, but they have key differences in terms of architecture, pricing, security, durability, data privacy, and decentralized storage.

Architecture: Amazon S3 is a centralized cloud storage solution offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It relies on a network of data centers owned and managed by Amazon. In contrast, Tardigrade is a decentralized storage platform that leverages peer-to-peer technology. It utilizes the spare storage capacity of thousands of independent storage nodes distributed globally to store and retrieve data.
Pricing: Amazon S3 follows a traditional pricing model based on storage usage, data transfer, and requests. Customers pay for the amount of data stored, data transferred in and out, and the number of requests made. Tardigrade offers a more cost-effective pricing structure. It implements a token-based system, where storage node operators are paid for their storage and bandwidth using the native cryptocurrency called Storj. This model generally reduces costs for the end-user.
Security: Both Amazon S3 and Tardigrade offer robust security measures. Amazon S3 provides access controls, encrypted storage, and integration with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM). On the other hand, Tardigrade encrypts data both in-transit and at-rest, utilizing client-side encryption. It also incorporates erasure coding and distributed redundancy to ensure data durability and integrity.
Durability: Amazon S3 ensures high durability by distributing data across multiple availability zones within a region. It offers durability durability of 99.999999999% (11 nines). Tardigrade achieves durability by dividing files into smaller chunks, encrypting and distributing them across a global network of storage nodes, ensuring 99.9999999999% (12 nines) durability.
Data Privacy: With Amazon S3, data privacy is subject to the terms and conditions agreed upon in the AWS customer agreement. Some customers may have concerns about data privacy due to the centralization of the service. Tardigrade places a strong emphasis on data privacy. Each file stored on Tardigrade is shredded into encrypted pieces, and only the end-user holds the decryption keys. This ensures that data is secure and private, even from the storage node operators.
Decentralized Storage: The key difference between Amazon S3 and Tardigrade lies in their approach to storage. Amazon S3 relies on centralized data centers owned by Amazon, while Tardigrade utilizes a global network of independent storage nodes. This decentralized approach makes Tardigrade more resilient to failures and censorship, as data is not controlled by a single entity.

Amazon S3 vs Tardigrade

Overview