Cocoa Touch (iOS) vs Amber Framework: What are the differences?
Developers describe Cocoa Touch (iOS) as "The Cocoa Touch collection of frameworks includes everything needed to create iOS apps". The Cocoa Touch layer contains key frameworks for building iOS apps. These frameworks define the appearance of your app. They also provide the basic app infrastructure and support for key technologies such as multitasking, touch-based input, push notifications, and many high-level system services. On the other hand, Amber Framework is detailed as "A Crystal web framework that makes building applications fast, simple, and enjoyable". It is an open source web application framework for the crystal language. It makes building web applications fast, simple, and enjoyable. It provides productivity and happiness through a powerful CLI and familiar design patterns seen in Kemal, Rails, Phoenix and other popular frameworks.
Cocoa Touch (iOS) and Amber Framework can be categorized as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.
Amber Framework is an open source tool with 1.82K GitHub stars and 146 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Amber Framework's open source repository on GitHub.
What is Amber Framework?
What is Cocoa Touch (iOS)?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose Amber Framework?
What are the cons of using Amber Framework?
What are the cons of using Cocoa Touch (iOS)?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
When we first built the ArifZefen app our focus was around validating our business assumptions and finding a good product fit. Once we got to a few thousand users, it became clear that we needed to make quality a priority and that meant we needed a reliable tool that will allow us to monitor the health of our app. Crashlytics (now Fabric by Twitter ) was on a short list of solutions we closely explored and we were very happy with its ease of integration and the consistency it brought to our Cocoa Touch (iOS) and Android SDK crash monitoring.
Its daily pulse emails were also super informative in giving us a good sense of how each platform was doing in terms of crash-free and new users, daily actives and other relevant session data. These emails also surfaced any anomalies in daily trends, alerting us of any reason for concern. Overall, Crashlytics was instrumental in allowing us to quickly discover and diagnose crashes and it is one of the main reasons we were able to keep our app store ratings reasonable high. But perhaps even more importantly, we were able to set a high quality bar for our users that absent Crashlytics would have been difficult to maintain.