StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Amber Framework vs Mono

Amber Framework vs Mono

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mono
Mono
Stacks94
Followers59
Votes1
GitHub Stars11.4K
Forks3.8K
Amber Framework
Amber Framework
Stacks6
Followers15
Votes2
GitHub Stars2.6K
Forks202

Amber Framework vs Mono: What are the differences?

Developers describe Amber Framework as "A Crystal web framework that makes building applications fast, simple, and enjoyable". It is an open source web application framework for the crystal language. It makes building web applications fast, simple, and enjoyable. It provides productivity and happiness through a powerful CLI and familiar design patterns seen in Kemal, Rails, Phoenix and other popular frameworks. On the other hand, Mono is detailed as "*Open source implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework *". It is a software platform designed to allow developers to easily create cross platform applications part of the .NET Foundation. It is an open source implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework based on the ECMA standards for C# and the Common Language Runtime.

Amber Framework and Mono belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by Amber Framework are:

  • Open source
  • Framework for the crystal language
  • Powerful CLI

On the other hand, Mono provides the following key features:

  • Cross platform
  • Open source
  • Implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework

Amber Framework and Mono are both open source tools. Mono with 8.19K GitHub stars and 3.28K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Amber Framework with 1.84K GitHub stars and 147 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mono
Mono
Amber Framework
Amber Framework

It is a software platform designed to allow developers to easily create cross platform applications part of the .NET Foundation. It is an open source implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework based on the ECMA standards for C# and the Common Language Runtime.

It is an open source web application framework for the crystal language. It makes building web applications fast, simple, and enjoyable. It provides productivity and happiness through a powerful CLI and familiar design patterns seen in Kemal, Rails, Phoenix and other popular frameworks.

Cross platform ;Open source; Implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework
Open source; Framework for the crystal language;Powerful CLI
Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.4K
GitHub Stars
2.6K
GitHub Forks
3.8K
GitHub Forks
202
Stacks
94
Stacks
6
Followers
59
Followers
15
Votes
1
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    It was great, pre-dotnetcore
Pros
  • 1
    Batteries included
  • 1
    Uses the crystal language, which is a ruby like languag
Cons
  • 1
    Small ecosystem
  • 1
    Slang makes tooling for html in your IDE harder
Integrations
Entity Framework
Entity Framework
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
C#
C#
Windows
Windows
Debian
Debian
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Debian
Debian
CentOS
CentOS
SQLite
SQLite
MySQL
MySQL
Crystal
Crystal

What are some alternatives to Mono, Amber Framework?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase