StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Development & Training Tools
  4. Data Science Tools
  5. Anaconda vs canopy

Anaconda vs canopy

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Anaconda
Anaconda
Stacks439
Followers490
Votes0
canopy
canopy
Stacks9
Followers12
Votes0
GitHub Stars505
Forks113

Anaconda vs canopy: What are the differences?

Key differences between Anaconda and Canopy

Anaconda and Canopy are both popular Python distributions that provide a comprehensive environment for programming and data analysis. While they share many similarities, there are some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Ease of Installation: Anaconda offers a simple and straightforward installation process. It includes all the necessary packages and libraries required for scientific computing out-of-the-box. Canopy, on the other hand, requires you to select and install packages manually, which can be more time-consuming for beginners.

  2. Package Management: Anaconda comes with its own package manager called Conda. Conda allows easy installation, update, and removal of packages, as well as management of different Python environments. Canopy, on the other hand, uses the standard Python package manager, Pip, which requires additional steps to manage environments and may lead to dependency conflicts.

  3. Integrated Development Environment (IDE): Canopy provides its own integrated development environment, which includes a code editor, debugger, and other tools. Anaconda does not include a specific IDE but can be easily integrated with popular IDEs like PyCharm or Jupyter Notebook.

  4. Support and Documentation: Anaconda has a large and active community, providing extensive support and documentation. It also has a vast ecosystem of packages and libraries that are well-documented. Canopy, although it has a smaller community, still offers good support and documentation, but may not have the same breadth of packages available.

  5. Pricing: Canopy offers both free and paid versions. The free version includes basic features, while the paid version provides additional tools and support. Anaconda, on the other hand, is completely free and open-source, making it accessible to all users without any limitations.

  6. Customization and Flexibility: Anaconda allows for more customization and flexibility in terms of package selection and management. It provides a wide variety of packages that can be easily installed and configured. Canopy, while offering a curated collection of packages, may not provide the same level of flexibility for customized installations.

In summary, Anaconda and Canopy are both powerful Python distributions, but Anaconda tends to be more beginner-friendly with its easy installation and comprehensive package management system. Canopy offers its own IDE and support for specific modules and packages. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the user's preferences and specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Anaconda
Anaconda
canopy
canopy

A free and open-source distribution of the Python and R programming languages for scientific computing, that aims to simplify package management and deployment. Package versions are managed by the package management system conda.

It is f# web automation and testing library, built on top of Selenium (friendly to c# also). It makes UI testing simple.

Stay safe and secure; Deliver on your data strategy; Get to market faster; Maximize flexibility and control
Solid stabilization layer built on top of Selenium. Death to "brittle, quirky, UI tests"; Quick to learn. Even if you've never done UI Automation, and don't know F#; Clean, concise API; .net Standard 2.0; MIT License
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
505
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
113
Stacks
439
Stacks
9
Followers
490
Followers
12
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Python
Python
PyCharm
PyCharm
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Atom-IDE
Atom-IDE
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
C#
C#
F#
F#

What are some alternatives to Anaconda, canopy?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Pandas

Pandas

Flexible and powerful data analysis / manipulation library for Python, providing labeled data structures similar to R data.frame objects, statistical functions, and much more.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

NumPy

NumPy

Besides its obvious scientific uses, NumPy can also be used as an efficient multi-dimensional container of generic data. Arbitrary data-types can be defined. This allows NumPy to seamlessly and speedily integrate with a wide variety of databases.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot