StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Android SDK vs Beego

Android SDK vs Beego

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Android SDK
Android SDK
Stacks27.6K
Followers20.7K
Votes800
Beego
Beego
Stacks52
Followers98
Votes0
GitHub Stars744
Forks183

Android SDK vs Beego: What are the differences?

  1. Platform Compatibility: Android SDK is primarily designed for developing applications for the Android platform, while Beego is a web application framework for building web applications using the Go programming language.
  2. Development Focus: Android SDK focuses on mobile application development specifically for the Android operating system, whereas Beego is more focused on rapid web development and scalability.
  3. Programming Language: Android SDK utilizes Java and Kotlin for development, while Beego is based on the Go programming language, which offers robust concurrency support and performance optimization.
  4. Community Support: Android SDK has a large and active community due to its widespread use, providing developers with access to a wealth of resources and support. On the other hand, Beego has a smaller but growing community that offers specific expertise related to web development using the Go language.
  5. Deployment Environment: Android SDK applications are deployed on mobile devices running the Android operating system, while Beego applications are typically deployed on web servers to serve web content and functionality.

In Summary, Android SDK is tailored for Android app development with Java/Kotlin, while Beego is a Go-based web framework focusing on web development and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Android SDK, Beego

Omran
Omran

CTO & Co-founder at Bonton Connect

Jun 19, 2020

Needs adviceonKotlinKotlin

We actually initially wrote a lot of networking code in Kotlin but the complexities involved prompted us to try and compile NodeJS for Android and port over all the networking logic to Node and communicate with node over the Java Native Interface.

This turned out to be a great decision considering our battery usage fell by 40% and rate of development increased by a factor of 2.

622k views622k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Android SDK
Android SDK
Beego
Beego

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

It is a RESTful HTTP framework for the rapid development of Go applications including APIs, web apps and backend services with integrated Go specific features such as interfaces and struct embedding.

-
Interfaces; Struct embedding; Rapid Development
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
744
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
183
Stacks
27.6K
Stacks
52
Followers
20.7K
Followers
98
Votes
800
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 289
    Android development
  • 156
    Necessary for android
  • 128
    Android studio
  • 86
    Mobile framework
  • 82
    Backed by google
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Java
Java
Golang
Golang
Sentry
Sentry
Laravel
Laravel
Stream
Stream
Python
Python
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
KeyCDN
KeyCDN

What are some alternatives to Android SDK, Beego?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase