StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET Core vs Android SDK

.NET Core vs Android SDK

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Android SDK
Android SDK
Stacks27.6K
Followers20.7K
Votes800
.NET Core
.NET Core
Stacks7.0K
Followers2.6K
Votes155
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K

.NET Core vs Android SDK: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In the world of software development, there are many different frameworks and platforms available to build applications for various environments. Two popular frameworks are .NET Core and Android SDK. While both frameworks are used for developing applications, they have distinct differences that make them suitable for different purposes.

1. Key difference: Architecture

The key difference between .NET Core and Android SDK lies in their architecture. .NET Core is a framework developed by Microsoft, primarily for building cross-platform applications. It is designed to be versatile and runs on multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. On the other hand, Android SDK is a software development kit specifically for building applications that run on the Android operating system. It provides developers with the necessary tools and libraries to develop Android applications.

2. Key difference: Programming languages

.NET Core and Android SDK also differ in terms of programming languages. .NET Core supports various programming languages such as C#, F#, and Visual Basic.NET. This gives developers the flexibility to choose a language they are comfortable with to build their applications. On the other hand, Android SDK primarily uses Java, Kotlin, and C++. While Java has been traditionally the main language for Android development, Kotlin has gained popularity in recent years due to its modern features and seamless integration with existing Java codebases.

3. Key difference: Development environment

Another significant difference between .NET Core and Android SDK lies in the development environment. .NET Core can be developed using multiple integrated development environments (IDEs) such as Visual Studio, Visual Studio Code, and JetBrains Rider. These IDEs provide advanced features and tools to enhance the development experience. On the other hand, Android SDK primarily uses Android Studio as the official IDE for Android development. Android Studio is specifically tailored for Android development and provides a comprehensive set of tools and features to build robust Android applications.

4. Key difference: Application ecosystem

.NET Core and Android SDK also have different application ecosystems. .NET Core has a wide range of libraries and frameworks available through NuGet, which is a package manager for .NET. These libraries and frameworks provide additional functionality and make it easier for developers to build applications. On the other hand, Android SDK has its own ecosystem of libraries and frameworks available through the Android API. These libraries and frameworks are specifically designed for Android development and provide access to various device capabilities and features.

5. Key difference: Target platforms

The target platforms for .NET Core and Android SDK are different. .NET Core can be used to build applications that run on a variety of platforms including Windows, macOS, and Linux. It allows developers to write code once and run it on multiple platforms without making significant modifications. On the other hand, Android SDK is specifically designed for building applications that run on the Android operating system. Although Android applications can be built using other frameworks such as Flutter or React Native, Android SDK provides direct access to Android-specific features and APIs.

6. Key difference: Deployment and distribution

Deployment and distribution of applications also differ between .NET Core and Android SDK. .NET Core applications can be deployed as self-contained executables or as published packages that include all the necessary dependencies. They can be distributed through various channels such as app stores, websites, or self-hosted servers. On the other hand, Android applications are typically distributed through the Google Play Store or other Android app stores. They are packaged as APK (Android Application Package) files, which contain all the necessary resources and code to run the application on Android devices.

In Summary, .NET Core is a cross-platform framework that supports multiple programming languages, while Android SDK is a software development kit specifically for building Android applications. They differ in terms of architecture, programming languages, development environment, application ecosystem, target platforms, and deployment and distribution methods.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Android SDK, .NET Core

Omran
Omran

CTO & Co-founder at Bonton Connect

Jun 19, 2020

Needs adviceonKotlinKotlin

We actually initially wrote a lot of networking code in Kotlin but the complexities involved prompted us to try and compile NodeJS for Android and port over all the networking logic to Node and communicate with node over the Java Native Interface.

This turned out to be a great decision considering our battery usage fell by 40% and rate of development increased by a factor of 2.

622k views622k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Dec 16, 2019

Review

There has been a lot of buzz around having PostgreSQL for ASP.NET Core 3.1 web apps. But Configuring Identity Server 4 with PostgreSQL is a real challenge. I've made a simple video to configure the ASP.NET Core 3.1 based Web application that uses AngualrJS as front end with Single Page App capabilities with Identity Server 4 talking to the PostgreSQL database. Check out this Video tutorial on how to do that in detail http://bit.ly/2EkotL5 You can access the entire code here on github http://bit.ly/35okpFj

210k views210k
Comments
Jakub
Jakub

Jan 2, 2020

Decided

I was researching multiple high performance, concurent//parallel languages for the needs of authentication and authorization server, to be built on microservice architecture and Linux OS. Node.js with its asynchronous behavior and event loop suits the case best. Python Django & Flash turns to be slower and .NET Core & Framework wasn't the best choice for the Linux environment at the time (summer 2018).

I also tested Go lang and Rust, although they didn't meet the quick prototyping criteria as both languages are young and lacking libraries or battle-tested ORM.

377k views377k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Android SDK
Android SDK
.NET Core
.NET Core

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Cross-platform (supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux) and can be used to build device, cloud, and IoT applications.

-
Cross-platform; Consistent across architectures; Command-line tools; Flexible deployment; Compatible with .NET Framework, Xamarin and Mono, via .NET Standard; Open source; Supported by Microsoft
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
Stacks
27.6K
Stacks
7.0K
Followers
20.7K
Followers
2.6K
Votes
800
Votes
155
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 289
    Android development
  • 156
    Necessary for android
  • 128
    Android studio
  • 86
    Mobile framework
  • 82
    Backed by google
Pros
  • 30
    Perfect to do any backend ( and a fast frontend) stuff
  • 27
    Fast
  • 26
    Cross-platform
  • 25
    Great performance
  • 18
    All Platform (Mac, Linux, Windows)
Integrations
Java
Java
Linux
Linux
C#
C#
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
.NET
.NET
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
Vim
Vim
Visual Basic
Visual Basic
F#
F#

What are some alternatives to Android SDK, .NET Core?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase