StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Android SDK vs Meteor

Android SDK vs Meteor

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Android SDK
Android SDK
Stacks27.6K
Followers20.7K
Votes800
Meteor
Meteor
Stacks1.9K
Followers1.8K
Votes1.7K
GitHub Stars44.8K
Forks5.3K

Android SDK vs Meteor: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between the Android SDK and Meteor in terms of their key differences.

  1. Programming Language: Android SDK uses Java or Kotlin as its primary programming language, while Meteor uses JavaScript. This difference in programming language affects the development process and the skills required for creating applications.

  2. Platform Compatibility: Android SDK is specifically designed for developing native Android applications, whereas Meteor is a full-stack JavaScript platform that enables the development of web, mobile, and desktop applications. This difference in platform compatibility makes Meteor a more versatile choice for cross-platform development.

  3. App Architecture: Android SDK follows an MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture by default, providing more control and flexibility in designing complex applications. In contrast, Meteor uses a reactive full-stack architecture that simplifies the development process by synchronizing data between client and server automatically.

  4. Integration with Native Features: Android SDK has better integration with native device features and APIs, allowing direct access to device sensors, camera, and various other functionalities. On the other hand, Meteor relies more on Cordova plugins to access native features, which may introduce some level of complexity and performance overhead.

  5. Community and Package Ecosystem: Android SDK has a large and well-established community, offering extensive documentation, support, and a wide range of libraries and frameworks for various functionalities. Meteor also has a supportive community, but it is comparatively smaller, resulting in a slightly limited choice of packages and resources.

  6. Development Workflow and Deployment: Android SDK provides dedicated development tools, such as Android Studio, along with efficient debugging and testing functionalities, specifically designed for Android app development. Meteor, on the other hand, offers a streamlined development workflow that allows real-time changes across all platforms during the development process. Deployment in Android SDK usually involves publishing the app to the Google Play Store, while Meteor offers various deployment options for web, mobile, and desktop applications.

In summary, Android SDK primarily focuses on native Android app development using Java or Kotlin, while Meteor provides a full-stack JavaScript platform for cross-platform application development with a reactive architecture and streamlined development workflow.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Android SDK, Meteor

beinoriusju
beinoriusju

Feb 25, 2022

Review

Whatever you do don't go WordPress path. Developers over-there tend to ignore system limitations and hardcode and overengineer their solutions so as to please their clients. If you are a beginner probably you'll get to work on someone else's shitty code and will be asked by your boss to do "yet another impossible thing with Wordpress". And... Probably... You'll do it.

My suggestion is: think in stacks and don't start too low. Starting with HTML, CSS3 and JavaScript is too low. Start on higher levels and with something practical. You'll have time for basics some time later and it would be much easier, because you'll see those technologies are compliment to what you do and not your main objective.

My suggestion for you:

  • Android Mobile App Development path (complex enough so you won't get bored)
  • All things web3 crypto, nft, virtual reality, blockchain path (has tons of computing web development tasks)
  • Cloud computing setup and administration path (good, because you say you're not good at programming)
  • Artificial intelligence and automation (this is future, people need this)

I've also found it helpful to think of each stack as a surface (find Google Images "radar chart") . Every time you try to learn something new you start in the center, with all technology-points overlapping. You are as low as you can get and you know nothing. Your job is to expand outwards each technology so as to make a stack-surace. The more surface the better. You'll see that some technological-aspects are easier to expand than others and plan your time accordingly.

Have a good start!

107k views107k
Comments
Omran
Omran

CTO & Co-founder at Bonton Connect

Jun 19, 2020

Needs adviceonKotlinKotlin

We actually initially wrote a lot of networking code in Kotlin but the complexities involved prompted us to try and compile NodeJS for Android and port over all the networking logic to Node and communicate with node over the Java Native Interface.

This turned out to be a great decision considering our battery usage fell by 40% and rate of development increased by a factor of 2.

622k views622k
Comments
Carl-Erik
Carl-Erik

Jan 23, 2020

Decided

This basically came down to two things: performance on compute-heavy tasks and a need for good tooling. We used to have a Meteor based Node.js application which worked great for RAD and getting a working prototype in a short time, but we felt pains trying to scale it, especially when doing anything involving crunching data, which Node sucks at. We also had bad experience with tooling support for doing large scale refactorings in Javascript compared to the best-in-class tools available for Java (IntelliJ). Given the heavy domain and very involved logic we wanted good tooling support to be able to do great refactorings that are just not possible in Javascript. Java is an old warhorse, but it performs fantastically and we have not regretted going down this route, avoiding "enterprise" smells and going as lightweight as we can, using Jdbi instead of Persistence API, a homegrown Actor Model library for massive concurrency, etc ...

374k views374k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Android SDK
Android SDK
Meteor
Meteor

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

-
Pure JavaScript;Live page updates;Clean, powerful data synchronization;Latency compensation;Hot Code Pushes;Sensitive code runs in a privileged environment;Fully self-contained application bundles; Interoperability;Smart Packages
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
44.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
Stacks
27.6K
Stacks
1.9K
Followers
20.7K
Followers
1.8K
Votes
800
Votes
1.7K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 289
    Android development
  • 156
    Necessary for android
  • 128
    Android studio
  • 86
    Mobile framework
  • 82
    Backed by google
Pros
  • 251
    Real-time
  • 200
    Full stack, one language
  • 183
    Best app dev platform available today
  • 155
    Data synchronization
  • 152
    Javascript
Cons
  • 5
    Does not scale well
  • 4
    Hard to debug issues on the server-side
  • 4
    Heavily CPU bound
Integrations
Java
Java
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
MongoDB
MongoDB
Node.js
Node.js
Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova

What are some alternatives to Android SDK, Meteor?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot