StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Android SDK vs NestJS

Android SDK vs NestJS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Android SDK
Android SDK
Stacks27.6K
Followers20.7K
Votes800
NestJS
NestJS
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.0K
Votes326
GitHub Stars73.3K
Forks8.1K

Android SDK vs NestJS: What are the differences?

Introduction

This markdown document provides a comparison between the Android SDK and NestJS, outlining the key differences between the two platforms.

  1. Purpose and Target Platform: Android SDK is a software development kit provided by Google primarily used for developing Android applications. It is designed to work specifically for the Android operating system, allowing developers to build native mobile apps. On the other hand, NestJS is a framework that runs on top of Node.js and is primarily used for developing server-side applications. It is language-agnostic and can be used to build applications for various platforms, including web, mobile, and desktop.

  2. Programming Languages: Android SDK uses Java and Kotlin as the primary programming languages for developing Android applications. It provides extensive support and libraries specifically for these languages, making it easier for developers to build Android apps. Whereas, NestJS supports multiple programming languages, including JavaScript and TypeScript, allowing developers with different language preferences to use the framework.

  3. Development Paradigm: Android SDK follows a more object-oriented programming (OOP) paradigm, where developers create classes, objects, and inheritance hierarchies to build applications. It provides features like activity lifecycle management, UI components, and event-driven programming. In contrast, NestJS follows a modular, component-based development approach commonly known as the "module-composer" pattern. It encourages the use of modules, controllers, and decorators for building scalable server-side applications.

  4. Architecture and Scalability: Android SDK follows a more monolithic architecture, where the entire application is built as a single package. This can make it less scalable and harder to maintain as the application grows in size and complexity. On the other hand, NestJS follows a more modular architecture, allowing developers to split their applications into smaller, independent modules. This makes it easier to scale and maintain the application as each module can be developed, deployed, and updated separately.

  5. Development Tools and Ecosystem: Android SDK provides a comprehensive set of development tools, including a full-featured integrated development environment (IDE) called Android Studio. It has a rich ecosystem of libraries, plugins, and tools specific to Android development. In contrast, NestJS does not provide an official IDE but can be used with any text editor or IDE supporting JavaScript or TypeScript. It benefits from the vast Node.js ecosystem, which includes numerous third-party libraries, frameworks, and tools that can be used in conjunction with NestJS.

  6. Community and Support: Android SDK has a large and active developer community due to the popularity of Android as a mobile platform. It has extensive documentation, online forums, and resources available for developers to learn and troubleshoot issues. NestJS, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller but growing community. However, it leverages the existing Node.js community, which provides a wealth of resources and support for developers using NestJS.

In summary, the key differences between Android SDK and NestJS lie in their purpose and target platform, programming languages, development paradigms, architecture and scalability, development tools and ecosystem, and community and support. Android SDK is primarily focused on native Android app development, using Java and Kotlin, following an object-oriented paradigm, and providing a comprehensive IDE and ecosystem. NestJS, on the other hand, is a server-side framework that supports multiple languages, follows a modular development approach, has a more modular architecture, can be used with any text editor or IDE, and leverages the Node.js ecosystem for additional tools and libraries.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Android SDK, NestJS

juan9222
juan9222

Jul 25, 2020

Needs advice

Hi there, I'm deciding the technology to use in my project.

I need to build software that has:

  • Login
  • Register
  • Main View (access to a user account, News, General Info, Business hours, software, and parts section).
  • Account Preferences.
  • Web Shop for Parts (Support, Download Sections, Ticket System).

The most critical functionality is a WebSocket that connects between a car that sends real-time data through serial communication, and a server performs diagnosis on the car and sends the results back to the user.

616k views616k
Comments
Louai
Louai

Full Stack Web Developer

May 15, 2020

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsTypeScriptTypeScriptExpressJSExpressJS

I'm planning with a small team to create an application which is a platform for restaurants. I'm on the backend almost alone currently. I'm going to use Node.js for that, and I'm very fond of TypeScript, and I worked before mostly with ExpressJS. The team may get bigger as the application becomes bigger and more successful, so I have the Scalability concern in mind now, and I was considering these options:

  1. Use Node+Express+Typescript
  2. Use Node+NestJs (which utilizes Typescript by default)

Option 2 is enticing to me because recently I came to love NestJS and it provides more scalability for the project and uses Typescript in the best way and uses Express under the hood. Also I come from an Angular 2 background, which I think is the best frontend framework (my opinion, and I know React quite well), which makes Nest feel familiar to me because of the similarity between Nest and Angular. Option 1 on the other hand uses Express which is a minimalist framework, very popular one, but it doesn't provide the same scalability and brings decision fatigue about what to combine with it and may not utilize Typescript in the best way. Yet, on the other hand, it is flexible and it may be easier to manipulate things in different ways with it. Another very important thing is that it would be easier in my view to hire Node developers with skills in Express than NestJs. The majority of Node developers are much more familiar with JavaScript and Express.

What is your advice and why? I would love to hear especially from developers who worked on both Express and Nest

549k views549k
Comments
Omran
Omran

CTO & Co-founder at Bonton Connect

Jun 19, 2020

Needs adviceonKotlinKotlin

We actually initially wrote a lot of networking code in Kotlin but the complexities involved prompted us to try and compile NodeJS for Android and port over all the networking logic to Node and communicate with node over the Java Native Interface.

This turned out to be a great decision considering our battery usage fell by 40% and rate of development increased by a factor of 2.

622k views622k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Android SDK
Android SDK
NestJS
NestJS

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Nest is a framework for building efficient, scalable Node.js server-side applications. It uses progressive JavaScript, is built with TypeScript (preserves compatibility with pure JavaScript) and combines elements of OOP (Object Oriented Programming), FP (Functional Programming), and FRP (Functional Reactive Programming). Under the hood, Nest makes use of Express, but also, provides compatibility with a wide range of other libraries, like e.g. Fastify, allowing for easy use of the myriad third-party plugins which are available.

-
Extensible - Gives you true flexibility by allowing use of any other libraries thanks to modular architecture.; Versatile - An adaptable ecosystem that is a fully-fledged backbone for all kinds of server-side applications.; Progressive - Takes advantage of latest JavaScript features, bringing design patterns and mature solutions to node.js world.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
73.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
8.1K
Stacks
27.6K
Stacks
2.7K
Followers
20.7K
Followers
3.0K
Votes
800
Votes
326
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 289
    Android development
  • 156
    Necessary for android
  • 128
    Android studio
  • 86
    Mobile framework
  • 82
    Backed by google
Pros
  • 54
    Powerful but super friendly to work with
  • 42
    Fast development
  • 40
    Easy to understand documentation
  • 36
    Angular style syntax for the backend
  • 32
    NodeJS ecosystem
Cons
  • 10
    User base is small. Less help on Stackoverflow
  • 10
    Difficult to debug
  • 5
    Angular-like architecture
  • 3
    Javascript
  • 3
    Updates with breaking changes
Integrations
Java
Java
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Android SDK, NestJS?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase