StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Angular UI Bootstrap vs Sinuous

Angular UI Bootstrap vs Sinuous

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Angular UI Bootstrap
Angular UI Bootstrap
Stacks41
Followers91
Votes0
GitHub Stars14.2K
Forks6.7K
Sinuous
Sinuous
Stacks0
Followers6
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.1K
Forks35

Angular UI Bootstrap vs Sinuous: What are the differences?

### Introduction
This comparison will highlight the key differences between Angular UI Bootstrap and Sinuous.

1. **Dependency on Angular**: Angular UI Bootstrap is specifically designed to work with Angular, leveraging its features and directives for UI components. On the other hand, Sinuous is a standalone library that does not rely on any specific framework, providing more flexibility in terms of integration with different front-end technologies.

2. **Component Customization**: Angular UI Bootstrap offers a set of predefined Angular directives for common UI components like modals, tooltips, and carousels, making it easier to implement these elements in Angular applications. Sinuous, however, provides a more minimalist approach, focusing on lightweight, reactive components that can be customized and styled according to the developer's preferences without the overhead of pre-built directives.

3. **Performance**: Angular UI Bootstrap components are built on top of Angular directives, which can sometimes result in performance overhead due to the framework's digest cycle and data binding mechanisms. Sinuous, being a lightweight library with a virtual DOM implementation, offers better performance optimization and rendering speed, especially for complex UI interactions and data updates.

4. **Ease of Learning Curve**: Angular UI Bootstrap requires knowledge of AngularJS concepts and directives to utilize its components effectively, which may steepen the learning curve for developers new to the framework. Sinuous, on the other hand, follows a simple and intuitive API design, making it easier for developers to grasp its concepts and start building UI components quickly without the need for extensive framework knowledge.

5. **Community Support and Documentation**: Angular UI Bootstrap benefits from the extensive Angular developer community and official documentation, providing a wealth of resources, tutorials, and community-driven support channels for users. Sinuous, being a newer and less mainstream library, may have a smaller user base and limited documentation, which could pose challenges in finding comprehensive resources and troubleshooting guidance.

6. **Flexibility in Architecture**: Angular UI Bootstrap follows the Angular architecture patterns and conventions, which may restrict the flexibility in how components are structured and integrated within an application. Sinuous, being framework-agnostic, allows for more freedom in defining the architecture and design patterns according to the developer's preferences, enabling a more tailored and optimized approach to building UI components.

In Summary, Angular UI Bootstrap is tightly integrated with Angular, provides predefined directives for UI components, and has good community support, while Sinuous offers stand-alone lightweight components, better performance, and flexibility in architecture without being tied to a specific framework.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Angular UI Bootstrap
Angular UI Bootstrap
Sinuous
Sinuous

It adds many components to extend Angular. It doesn't use jQuery and are directives built from the ground up for each of the Bootstrap JS components.

It provides the clarity of declarative views and the performance of direct DOM manipulation. It helps keep your bundle size down, a basic counter is just shy of 1.4kB This makes it an ideal library to use in embeds, components, UI widgets, etc.

carousel; datepicker; datepickerPopup; dropdown
provides a template add-on that can pre-render repetitive HTML snippets; makes your code clear, more predictable and easier to debug
Statistics
GitHub Stars
14.2K
GitHub Stars
1.1K
GitHub Forks
6.7K
GitHub Forks
35
Stacks
41
Stacks
0
Followers
91
Followers
6
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
JavaScript
JavaScript
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Firefox
Firefox

What are some alternatives to Angular UI Bootstrap, Sinuous?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase