StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Angular UI Bootstrap vs Vanilla.JS

Angular UI Bootstrap vs Vanilla.JS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Angular UI Bootstrap
Angular UI Bootstrap
Stacks41
Followers91
Votes0
GitHub Stars14.2K
Forks6.7K
Vanilla.JS
Vanilla.JS
Stacks82
Followers85
Votes9

Angular UI Bootstrap vs Vanilla.JS: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of web development, there are various frameworks and libraries available to simplify the process. Angular UI Bootstrap and Vanilla.JS are two popular tools used for building web applications. Below are key differences between Angular UI Bootstrap and Vanilla.JS that developers should consider when choosing a tool for their project.

  1. Framework vs Library: Angular UI Bootstrap is a framework that provides a set of pre-built components and a structured way to develop web applications using AngularJS. On the other hand, Vanilla.JS is a lightweight library that offers a collection of helper functions for DOM manipulation, event handling, and AJAX requests without enforcing any specific structure on the project.

  2. Learning Curve: Angular UI Bootstrap requires developers to learn AngularJS concepts and practices to effectively utilize its features. This can result in a steeper learning curve for beginners compared to Vanilla.JS, which has a more straightforward approach and allows developers to work directly with native JavaScript syntax without additional abstractions.

  3. Community Support: Angular UI Bootstrap benefits from the large AngularJS community, which provides resources, tutorials, and third-party libraries to extend its functionality. Vanilla.JS, on the other hand, has a broad and active community support due to its widespread use and adoption by developers around the world.

  4. Dependency Management: Angular UI Bootstrap relies on AngularJS as its core dependency, meaning that developers need to include both AngularJS and Angular UI Bootstrap scripts in their projects. In contrast, Vanilla.JS is a standalone library that does not have external dependencies, making it easier to integrate into projects without worrying about conflicting dependencies.

  5. Flexibility and Customization: Angular UI Bootstrap offers a set of predefined components and templates that follow the AngularJS design principles, which can limit the flexibility for customization in some cases. Vanilla.JS, on the other hand, provides developers with the freedom to build and customize components from scratch using plain JavaScript, allowing for greater control over the design and functionality of the application.

  6. Performance: Vanilla.JS generally outperforms Angular UI Bootstrap in terms of speed and efficiency due to its lightweight nature and direct manipulation of the DOM. On the other hand, Angular UI Bootstrap may introduce additional layers of abstraction and overhead, which can impact the overall performance of the application, especially in large-scale projects.

In Summary, Angular UI Bootstrap and Vanilla.JS differ in their approach to web development, with the former being a framework with structured components and dependencies, while the latter is a lightweight library that offers more flexibility and direct control over the code. Developers should consider their project requirements and programming preferences when choosing between the two tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Angular UI Bootstrap
Angular UI Bootstrap
Vanilla.JS
Vanilla.JS

It adds many components to extend Angular. It doesn't use jQuery and are directives built from the ground up for each of the Bootstrap JS components.

It is a fast and cross-platform framework for building incredible, powerful JavaScript applications. it is the most lightweight framework available anywhere.

carousel; datepicker; datepickerPopup; dropdown
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
14.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
41
Stacks
82
Followers
91
Followers
85
Votes
0
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Web-components
  • 1
    NO CONVENTIONS
  • 1
    Unopinionated
  • 1
    Easy to learn
Cons
  • 2
    You need to build anything yourself
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Angular UI Bootstrap, Vanilla.JS?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase