Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AngularJS vs Aurelia vs Ember.js: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between AngularJS, Aurelia, and Ember.js, highlighting their key differences.
Architecture: AngularJS follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, while Aurelia uses a module-based architecture with separation of concerns for cleaner code organization. Ember.js, on the other hand, follows the convention over configuration approach for its architecture, making it easier for developers to get started quickly.
Data Binding: AngularJS uses two-way data binding, meaning any changes in the model are automatically reflected in the view and vice versa. Aurelia also offers powerful two-way data binding capabilities. In contrast, Ember.js predominantly uses one-way data binding, where changes in the model do not automatically update the view.
Performance: AngularJS is known for its impressive performance with large-scale applications due to its dependency injection and digest cycle. Aurelia is designed with performance in mind, using virtual DOM and fine-grained data binding for optimized rendering. Ember.js provides automatic rendering optimization, making it suitable for complex and data-heavy applications.
Learning Curve: AngularJS has a steeper learning curve compared to Aurelia and Ember.js due to its extensive features and complexity. Aurelia is considered more developer-friendly and easier to learn with its simple yet powerful syntax. Ember.js strikes a balance between the two, offering a learning curve that falls between AngularJS and Aurelia.
Community Support: AngularJS has a large community that provides extensive resources, tutorials, and plugins. Aurelia has a growing community but may have limited resources compared to AngularJS. Ember.js has a dedicated community with a strong focus on maintainability and long-term support for web applications.
In Summary, AngularJS, Aurelia, and Ember.js differ in their architecture, data binding mechanisms, performance, learning curves, and community support, catering to different developer preferences and project requirements.
What is the best MVC stack to build mobile-friendly, light-weight, and fast single-page application with Spring Boot as back-end (Java)? Is Bootstrap still required to front-end layer these days?
The idea is to host on-premise initially with the potential to move to the cloud. Which combo would have minimal developer ramp-up time and low long-term maintenance costs (BAU support)?
React might be a good option if you're considering a mobile app for the future, because of react native. Although, Vue.js has the easiest learning curve and offers a better developer ramp-up time. Vue.js is great to build SPAs, very clean and organized and you won't have a lot of long-term maintenance problems (like AngularJS, for example). Bootstrap can still be used, but with flexbox there's no need anymore.
I recommend React because of less memory occupant compare to Angular, but this will depend on your organisation flexibility. When you use React you need to import different libraries as per your need. On the other side angular is a complete framework.
Performance-wise I vote for react js as it loads up quickly and lighter on the mobile. You can make good PWA with SSR as well.
If you are new to all three react will be a good choice considering, react-native will be useful if you want to build cross platform mobile application today or tomorrow. If you are talking about bootstrap styling framework than it's a choice you can style ur components by ur self or use bootstrap 4.0 framework. The complete stack mentioned above is platform agnostic u can run it anywhere you want be it cloud or on-premise.
We choose React for our client-side implementation because of React's virtual DOM implementation and component rendering optimization. It can help our app to be more stable and easier to debug. Also, react has strong support from the dev community. There is an enormous amount of reacting libraries we could use, which will speed up our development process.
Have you ever stuck with the question that which one is the best front-end framework for you?
With continuous web development progress, the trends of the latest front-end technologies are also continuously changing with more and more sophisticated web features. These top front-end frameworks and libraries have made your complex web tasks more flexible and efficient.
Check out top front end frameworks and their features at https://www.nmtechedge.com/2020/09/24/top-4-trending-front-end-frameworks-2020/
I honestly think the best choice for which framework you use should come down to your team's skills. If you have one Senior Dev that is great at React, but like 3-4 mid-level devs, and a handful of junior devs that know Vue.js ... maybe look at using Vue.js a little more seriously.
Yes, there are pros and cons to framework decisions, but I honestly see a LOT of teams not even consider whether a specific framework is a good fit.
I honestly think the best choice for which framework you use should come down to your team's skills. If you have one Senior Dev that is great at React, but like 3-4 mid-level devs, and a handful of junior devs that know Angular ... maybe look at using Angular a little more seriously.
Yes, there are pros and cons to framework decisions, but I honestly see a LOT of teams not even consider whether a specific framework is a good fit.
It was easier to find people who've worked on React than Vue. Angular did not have this problem, but seemed way too bloated compared to React. Angular also brings in restrictions working within their MVC framework. React on the other hand only handles the view/rendering part and rest of the control is left to the developers. React has a very active community, support and has lots of ready-to-use plugins/libraries available.
It is a very versatile library that provides great development speed. Although, with a bad organization, maintaining projects can be a disaster. With a good architecture, this does not happen.
Angular is obviously powerful and robust. I do not rule it out for any future application, in fact with the arrival of micro frontends and cross-functional teams I think it could be useful. However, if I have to build a stack from scratch again, I'm left with react.
I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.
Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.
I was first sceptical about using Angular over AngularJS. That's because AngularJS was so easy to integrate in existing websites. But building apps from scratch with Angular is so much easier. Of course, you have to build and boilerplate them first, but after that - you save a ton of time. Also it's very cozy to write code in TypeScript.
Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:
- Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
- Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
- Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
- TypeScript as programming language
- Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
- ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
- Jest as testing framework
- Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
- NativeScript-Vue for mobile development
The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:
- Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
- Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
- Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
- Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
- Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
- Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
It is a complete waste of time and life to learn a different framework to solve the same problem (Both AngularJS and Angular build A+ UI's, but both require a lot of time to learn). It's dumb to spend 200 hours learning AngularJS, then 200 hours learning Angular when you could spend 200 hours learning AngularJS and 200 hours learning how to solve a different problem (like AI/ML, Data Science, AR/VR, Digital Marketing, etc.)
Pros of AngularJS
- Quick to develop889
- Great mvc589
- Powerful573
- Restful520
- Backed by google505
- Two-way data binding349
- Javascript343
- Open source329
- Dependency injection307
- Readable197
- Fast75
- Directives65
- Great community63
- Free57
- Extend html vocabulary38
- Components29
- Easy to test26
- Easy to learn25
- Easy to templates24
- Great documentation23
- Easy to start21
- Awesome19
- Light weight18
- Angular 2.015
- Efficient14
- Javascript mvw framework14
- Great extensions14
- Easy to prototype with11
- High performance9
- Coffeescript9
- Two-way binding8
- Lots of community modules8
- Mvc8
- Easy to e2e7
- Clean and keeps code readable7
- One of the best frameworks6
- Easy for small applications6
- Works great with jquery5
- Fast development5
- I do not touch DOM4
- The two-way Data Binding is awesome4
- Hierarchical Data Structure3
- Be a developer, not a plumber.3
- Declarative programming3
- Typescript3
- Dart3
- Community3
- Fkin awesome2
- Opinionated in the right areas2
- Supports api , easy development2
- Common Place2
- Very very useful and fast framework for development2
- Linear learning curve2
- Great2
- Amazing community support2
- Readable code2
- Programming fun again2
- The powerful of binding, routing and controlling routes2
- Scopes2
- Consistency with backend architecture if using Nest2
- Fk react, all my homies hate react1
Pros of Aurelia
- Simple with conventions47
- Modern architecture42
- Makes sense and is mostly javascript not framework39
- Extensible31
- Integrates well with other components28
- Easy to use27
- Dependency Injection25
- Modular22
- Great router20
- Adaptive Data Binding16
- Typescript, ES2015, ES201613
- IoC, Modularity, Simplicity, Full Stack11
- Good binding system9
- Based on ES79
- Testable6
- Convention based6
- Quick to develop5
- Solid Documentation4
- Evolving standards compliance4
- Smooth learning curve4
- Outstanding Support (paid)4
- Reactive binding system1
- TypeScript1
Pros of Ember.js
- Elegant126
- Quick to develop97
- Great mvc83
- Great community82
- Great router73
- Values conventions, there is one-true way to organize52
- Open source50
- Components44
- Mvc framework34
- Handlebars.js28
- Htmlbars13
- Yehuda katz11
- Tom dale10
- Great logo10
- It's NOT Google or Facebook6
- manages large data sets on the front end easily5
- Convention over Configuration5
- Glimmer: react-like rendering engine5
- Organized4
- Fast4
- Enterprise4
- Intelligent4
- It rocks4
- Good docs3
- Fastest spinning circles3
- IE8 support3
- Easy and Quick to develop2
- Documentation is finally active and updated2
- Flexibility1
- Business wins1
- Comprehensive1
- Great for big apps/many devs because its organized1
- Growing community1
- For building ambitious Web apps1
- Dependency Injection1
- Stability without stagnation1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AngularJS
- Complex12
- Event Listener Overload3
- Dependency injection3
- Hard to learn2
- Learning Curve2
Cons of Aurelia
Cons of Ember.js
- Very little flexibility2
- Too much convention, too little configuration2
- Hard to integrate with Non Ruby apps1
- Hard to use if your API isn't RESTful1