AngularJS vs Thymeleaf

Overview

AngularJS

Stacks61.5K

Followers44.5K

Votes5.3K

GitHub Stars59.0K

Forks27.3K

Thymeleaf

Stacks212

Followers296

Votes4

AngularJS vs Thymeleaf: What are the differences?

AngularJS vs Thymeleaf: Key Differences

AngularJS and Thymeleaf are both popular web development frameworks, but they have distinct characteristics that set them apart. Here are the key differences between AngularJS and Thymeleaf:

Language: AngularJS uses JavaScript while Thymeleaf uses Java. This difference in language affects the development process and the skills required for working with these frameworks. AngularJS's JavaScript-based approach may be more familiar to frontend developers, while Thymeleaf's Java-based approach may be preferred by backend developers.
Design Pattern: AngularJS follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) design pattern, which separates the application logic, user interface, and data. Thymeleaf, on the other hand, follows the Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM) design pattern, which emphasizes a clear separation of concerns and easy integration with backend technologies.
Client-Side vs Server-Side Rendering: AngularJS is a client-side rendering framework, meaning that the majority of the webpage rendering is performed on the client's browser using JavaScript. Thymeleaf, on the other hand, is a server-side rendering framework, where the rendering process occurs on the server before sending the final HTML to the client's browser.
Scalability and Performance: AngularJS is known for its scalability and performance, especially when building large-scale, single-page applications. Thymeleaf, on the other hand, is more suited for traditional server-rendered web applications with smaller complexities. AngularJS's ability to handle complex data binding and dynamic content make it a powerful choice for performance-intensive applications.
Learning Curve: AngularJS has a steeper learning curve compared to Thymeleaf. AngularJS introduces many concepts and features, such as directives, services, and dependency injection, which may require more time and effort to grasp. Thymeleaf, on the other hand, has a simpler syntax and is easier to pick up, especially for Java developers.
Integration with Backend Technologies: AngularJS is typically used as a standalone frontend framework and can be integrated with any backend technology using RESTful APIs. Thymeleaf, on the other hand, is often used with Java-based backend frameworks, such as Spring, where it can seamlessly integrate with server-side Java code and easily bind data from the backend to the UI.

In summary, AngularJS and Thymeleaf differ in terms of language, design pattern, rendering approach, scalability, learning curve, and backend integration. Understanding these differences can help developers choose the right framework based on their specific project requirements and skillset.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on AngularJS, Thymeleaf

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

Decidedon

Vuetify

Vue.js

Nuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

@{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
@{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
@{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
@{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
@{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
@{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
@{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
@{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.

5.13M views5.13M

Comments

John Clifford

Software Engineer at CircleYY

Jun 8, 2020

Decided

I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.

Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.

455k views455k

Comments

José

Head of Engineering & Development at Chiper

Jun 23, 2020

Decided

It is a very versatile library that provides great development speed. Although, with a bad organization, maintaining projects can be a disaster. With a good architecture, this does not happen.

Angular is obviously powerful and robust. I do not rule it out for any future application, in fact with the arrival of micro frontends and cross-functional teams I think it could be useful. However, if I have to build a stack from scratch again, I'm left with react.

592k views592k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

AngularJS	Thymeleaf
AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.	It is a modern server-side Java template engine for both web and standalone environments. It is aimed at creating elegant web code while adding powerful features and retaining prototyping abilities.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 27.3K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 61.5K	Stacks 212
Followers 44.5K	Followers 296
Votes 5.3K	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 889 Quick to develop 589 Great mvc 573 Powerful 520 Restful 505 Backed by google Cons 12 Complex 4 Dependency injection 3 Event Listener Overload 2 Learning Curve 2 Hard to learn	Pros 4 Its delicous
Integrations
JavaScript	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to AngularJS, Thymeleaf?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Related Comparisons

AngularJS vs Thymeleaf: What are the differences?

AngularJS vs Thymeleaf: Key Differences

AngularJS and Thymeleaf are both popular web development frameworks, but they have distinct characteristics that set them apart. Here are the key differences between AngularJS and Thymeleaf:

Language: AngularJS uses JavaScript while Thymeleaf uses Java. This difference in language affects the development process and the skills required for working with these frameworks. AngularJS's JavaScript-based approach may be more familiar to frontend developers, while Thymeleaf's Java-based approach may be preferred by backend developers.
Design Pattern: AngularJS follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) design pattern, which separates the application logic, user interface, and data. Thymeleaf, on the other hand, follows the Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM) design pattern, which emphasizes a clear separation of concerns and easy integration with backend technologies.
Client-Side vs Server-Side Rendering: AngularJS is a client-side rendering framework, meaning that the majority of the webpage rendering is performed on the client's browser using JavaScript. Thymeleaf, on the other hand, is a server-side rendering framework, where the rendering process occurs on the server before sending the final HTML to the client's browser.
Scalability and Performance: AngularJS is known for its scalability and performance, especially when building large-scale, single-page applications. Thymeleaf, on the other hand, is more suited for traditional server-rendered web applications with smaller complexities. AngularJS's ability to handle complex data binding and dynamic content make it a powerful choice for performance-intensive applications.
Learning Curve: AngularJS has a steeper learning curve compared to Thymeleaf. AngularJS introduces many concepts and features, such as directives, services, and dependency injection, which may require more time and effort to grasp. Thymeleaf, on the other hand, has a simpler syntax and is easier to pick up, especially for Java developers.
Integration with Backend Technologies: AngularJS is typically used as a standalone frontend framework and can be integrated with any backend technology using RESTful APIs. Thymeleaf, on the other hand, is often used with Java-based backend frameworks, such as Spring, where it can seamlessly integrate with server-side Java code and easily bind data from the backend to the UI.

AngularJS vs Thymeleaf

Overview

AngularJS vs Thymeleaf: What are the differences?