AngularUI vs jQuery UI

Overview

jQuery UI

Stacks40.6K

Followers13.3K

Votes899

GitHub Stars11.3K

Forks5.3K

AngularUI

Stacks165

Followers168

Votes0

AngularUI vs jQuery UI: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing AngularUI and jQuery UI, there are key differences that developers need to be aware of to choose the right tool for their web projects.

Component Framework vs Library: AngularUI is a component framework built on top of AngularJS, providing a set of ready-to-use components like datepickers, modals, and more. On the other hand, jQuery UI is a library focused on UI widgets and interactions, offering a wide range of widgets for building interactive web interfaces.
Two-way Data Binding: AngularUI offers two-way data binding by default, which means that changes in the model are instantly reflected in the view and vice versa. This simplifies the development process and reduces the need for manual DOM manipulation. On the contrary, jQuery UI does not have built-in two-way data binding, requiring developers to handle data synchronization manually.
Dependency Injection: AngularUI comes with a powerful dependency injection system that helps manage dependencies between components and services, making it easier to test and maintain code. In contrast, jQuery UI does not provide a built-in dependency injection mechanism, making it less flexible in handling dependencies between different UI elements.
Separation of Concerns: AngularUI promotes the separation of concerns by following the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, where the logic, presentation, and data are separated into different components. This makes it easier to maintain and scale the codebase. Meanwhile, jQuery UI does not enforce a specific architecture, leaving it up to developers to implement their preferred design patterns.
Customization and Extensibility: AngularUI offers a high level of customization and extensibility through directives, filters, and services, allowing developers to create their own reusable components and extend built-in functionalities. On the contrary, while jQuery UI is customizable to some extent, it may require more effort and manual coding to create complex custom components.
Native Mobile Support: AngularUI provides better support for developing mobile-responsive web applications, leveraging features like touch events, gestures, and responsive design out of the box. jQuery UI, while compatible with mobile devices, may require additional plugins or customization to optimize performance and user experience on mobile platforms.

In Summary, AngularUI and jQuery UI differ in terms of architectural approach, data binding mechanisms, dependency management, customization options, and mobile support, catering to different development requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

jQuery UI	AngularUI
Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.	UI-Modules Standalone AngularUI modules.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 11.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 5.3K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 40.6K	Stacks 165
Followers 13.3K	Followers 168
Votes 899	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 215 Ui components 156 Cross-browser 121 Easy 100 It's jquery 81 Open source Cons 1 Does not contain charts or graphs	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	AngularJS

What are some alternatives to jQuery UI, AngularUI?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

AngularUI vs jQuery UI: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing AngularUI and jQuery UI, there are key differences that developers need to be aware of to choose the right tool for their web projects.

Component Framework vs Library: AngularUI is a component framework built on top of AngularJS, providing a set of ready-to-use components like datepickers, modals, and more. On the other hand, jQuery UI is a library focused on UI widgets and interactions, offering a wide range of widgets for building interactive web interfaces.
Two-way Data Binding: AngularUI offers two-way data binding by default, which means that changes in the model are instantly reflected in the view and vice versa. This simplifies the development process and reduces the need for manual DOM manipulation. On the contrary, jQuery UI does not have built-in two-way data binding, requiring developers to handle data synchronization manually.
Dependency Injection: AngularUI comes with a powerful dependency injection system that helps manage dependencies between components and services, making it easier to test and maintain code. In contrast, jQuery UI does not provide a built-in dependency injection mechanism, making it less flexible in handling dependencies between different UI elements.
Separation of Concerns: AngularUI promotes the separation of concerns by following the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, where the logic, presentation, and data are separated into different components. This makes it easier to maintain and scale the codebase. Meanwhile, jQuery UI does not enforce a specific architecture, leaving it up to developers to implement their preferred design patterns.
Customization and Extensibility: AngularUI offers a high level of customization and extensibility through directives, filters, and services, allowing developers to create their own reusable components and extend built-in functionalities. On the contrary, while jQuery UI is customizable to some extent, it may require more effort and manual coding to create complex custom components.
Native Mobile Support: AngularUI provides better support for developing mobile-responsive web applications, leveraging features like touch events, gestures, and responsive design out of the box. jQuery UI, while compatible with mobile devices, may require additional plugins or customization to optimize performance and user experience on mobile platforms.

AngularUI vs jQuery UI

Overview