Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Animate.css vs Material Design for Angular: What are the differences?
Developers describe Animate.css ** as "A library of CSS animations". It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness. On the other hand, **Material Design for Angular is detailed as "Material Design for AngularJS Apps". Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.
Animate.css and Material Design for Angular are primarily classified as "CSS Pre-processors / Extensions" and "Front-End Frameworks" tools respectively.
Animate.css and Material Design for Angular are both open source tools. Animate.css with 61.2K GitHub stars and 13K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Material Design for Angular with 16.5K GitHub stars and 3.58K GitHub forks.
Pros of Animate.css
Pros of Material Design for Angular
- Ui components121
- Backed by google62
- Free51
- Backed by angular50
- Javascript47
- Open source34
- Responsiveness32
- Easy to learn30
- Quick to develop28
- Customizable20
- Powerful8
- Easy to start8
- Flexible6
- Themes6
- Flexbox Layouts4
- Great community3
- I like its design3
- Great extensions2
- Consistents1
- CDK1
- It's the best looking out of the box1
- Seamless integration with AngularJS but lack of docs1
- Progressive Web Apps - to learn0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Animate.css
Cons of Material Design for Angular
- No practical examples4