Animate.css vs Mozilla Brick

Overview

Mozilla Brick

Stacks3

Followers12

Votes1

GitHub Stars3.0K

Forks201

Animate.css

Stacks11.4K

Followers3.1K

Votes0

Animate.css vs Mozilla Brick: What are the differences?

What is Animate.css ? A library of CSS animations. It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness.

What is Mozilla Brick? UI Components for Modern Web Apps. Brick is a collection of UI components designed for the easy and quick building of web application UIs. Brick components are built using the Web Components standard to allow developers to describe the UI of their app using the HTML syntax they already know.

Animate.css can be classified as a tool in the "CSS Pre-processors / Extensions" category, while Mozilla Brick is grouped under "Front-End Frameworks".

Animate.css and Mozilla Brick are both open source tools. It seems that Animate.css with 61.2K GitHub stars and 13K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Mozilla Brick with 3.04K GitHub stars and 229 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mozilla Brick	Animate.css
Brick is a collection of UI components designed for the easy and quick building of web application UIs. Brick components are built using the Web Components standard to allow developers to describe the UI of their app using the HTML syntax they already know.	It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness.
-	Cross-browser animations; Usage with Javascript; Setting Delay and Speed
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 201	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 3	Stacks 11.4K
Followers 12	Followers 3.1K
Votes 1	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Inovative	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	CSS 3 HTML5

What are some alternatives to Mozilla Brick, Animate.css ?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Sass

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Animate.css vs Mozilla Brick