StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Animate.css vs Nuxt.js

Animate.css vs Nuxt.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Nuxt.js
Nuxt.js
Stacks2.0K
Followers1.7K
Votes372
Animate.css
Animate.css
Stacks11.4K
Followers3.1K
Votes0

Animate.css vs Nuxt.js: What are the differences?

  1. Animation Library vs. JavaScript Framework: Animate.css is a popular CSS animation library that provides ready-to-use animations for web elements, while Nuxt.js is a JavaScript framework designed for building Vue.js applications.

  2. Ease of Use: Animate.css offers a simple way to incorporate animations by adding CSS classes to elements, making it beginner-friendly. In contrast, Nuxt.js requires more advanced knowledge of JavaScript and Vue.js to fully utilize its features.

  3. Purpose: Animate.css is primarily focused on adding visual effects and animations to websites, enhancing the user experience. Nuxt.js, on the other hand, is a framework for building complex, interactive web applications with features like server-side rendering and routing.

  4. Community Support: Animate.css has a large community of users who contribute to the library with new animations and updates, ensuring continued growth and development. Nuxt.js also has a supportive community but is more focused on providing tools and resources for building Vue.js applications.

  5. Integration with other Libraries: Animate.css can easily be integrated with other libraries like jQuery to create dynamic animations and effects. Nuxt.js, being a framework itself, has built-in support for various Vue.js libraries and plugins, streamlining the development process.

  6. Performance Impact: Animate.css can sometimes have performance issues due to the use of CSS animations, which can impact page load times. Nuxt.js, being a framework designed for optimization, offers better performance with features like server-side rendering and code-splitting.

In Summary, Animate.css and Nuxt.js differ in their focus, ease of use, community support, integration capabilities, and performance impact.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Nuxt.js
Nuxt.js
Animate.css
Animate.css

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness.

Automatic transpilation and bundling; Hot module replacement; Server-side rendering OR Single Page App OR Static Generated, you choose 🔥; Static file serving; Configurable with a nuxt.config.js file; Custom layouts with the layouts/ directory; Middleware; Code splitting for every pages
Cross-browser animations; Usage with Javascript; Setting Delay and Speed
Statistics
Stacks
2.0K
Stacks
11.4K
Followers
1.7K
Followers
3.1K
Votes
372
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    SSR
  • 47
    Automatic routes
  • 33
    Middleware
  • 29
    Hot code reloading
  • 22
    Easy setup, easy to use, great community, FRENCH TOUCH
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
CSS 3
CSS 3
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Nuxt.js, Animate.css ?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Sass

Sass

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

Less

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase