StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. Apache Ignite vs Elasticsearch

Apache Ignite vs Elasticsearch

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Stacks35.0K
Followers27.1K
Votes1.6K
Apache Ignite
Apache Ignite
Stacks99
Followers168
Votes41
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks1.9K

Apache Ignite vs Elasticsearch: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Ignite and Elasticsearch are both popular open-source distributed platforms used for data storage and analysis. Despite some similarities, there are key differences between the two that make them suitable for different use cases. This article will highlight and explain the main differences between Apache Ignite and Elasticsearch.

  1. Data Processing and Analytics: Apache Ignite is primarily designed as an in-memory data processing platform, whereas Elasticsearch is optimized for search and analytics on distributed data. Ignite uses distributed in-memory computing techniques to provide real-time analytics and processing capabilities, making it suitable for use cases that require low-latency data access and real-time processing. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, leverages its distributed search and indexing capabilities, making it more suitable for use cases that need powerful full-text searching and analysis of structured and unstructured data.

  2. Data Model and Query Language: Another key difference lies in the data model and query language used by these platforms. Apache Ignite supports various data models, including key-value, SQL, and compute grid, allowing users to choose the most appropriate model for their specific needs. It also supports SQL queries, making it easier for users familiar with SQL to interact with the data. In contrast, Elasticsearch uses a document-oriented data model and a query language called Elasticsearch Query DSL. This query language is specifically designed for full-text searching and provides features like faceted search, filtering, and relevance scoring.

  3. Scalability and Fault Tolerance: Both Apache Ignite and Elasticsearch are designed to be highly scalable and fault-tolerant. However, the underlying mechanisms differ. Apache Ignite achieves scalability by distributing data and computation across a cluster of nodes, allowing it to handle large amounts of data and processing tasks. It also provides data replication and backup mechanisms to ensure fault tolerance. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, achieves scalability by sharding data across multiple nodes and using a distributed architecture. It also provides automated failover and replication mechanisms to ensure high availability and fault tolerance.

  4. Data Indexing and Search Capabilities: One of the key strengths of Elasticsearch lies in its powerful and efficient search capabilities. It uses inverted indexes to index and search data, making it fast and efficient for full-text and structured searches. It also provides advanced features like relevance scoring, fuzzy matching, and aggregations. Apache Ignite, on the other hand, does not provide built-in search capabilities like Elasticsearch. While it can perform basic queries on in-memory data using SQL, it may not be as efficient or feature-rich as Elasticsearch for complex search use cases.

  5. Integration and Ecosystem: Apache Ignite is designed to integrate well with existing databases and data sources. It provides various connectors and integrations for popular databases like MySQL, Oracle, and PostgreSQL. It also integrates with other Apache projects like Hadoop and Spark, allowing users to leverage their existing ecosystem. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, is part of the Elastic Stack, which includes various complementary tools like Logstash and Kibana. These tools provide end-to-end data ingestion, processing, and visualization capabilities, making it a comprehensive solution for data analytics and search.

  6. Data Durability and Persistence: Apache Ignite provides durable memory-based storage, allowing it to survive node restarts and failures. It also supports disk-based persistence, which can be used to store larger datasets that do not fit entirely in memory. Elasticsearch, on the other hand, provides durability and persistence through its distributed storage model. It shards and replicates data across multiple nodes, ensuring data availability even in the face of node failures. It also provides data snapshot and restore capabilities for backup and recovery purposes.

In summary, Apache Ignite and Elasticsearch are both powerful distributed platforms, but they have key differences in terms of data processing and analytics capabilities, data model and query language, scalability and fault tolerance mechanisms, search capabilities, integration and ecosystem, and data durability and persistence. The choice between the two depends on the specific use case and requirements of the project.

Advice on Elasticsearch, Apache Ignite

Rana Usman
Rana Usman

Chief Technology Officer at TechAvanza

Jun 4, 2020

Needs adviceonFirebaseFirebaseElasticsearchElasticsearchAlgoliaAlgolia

Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?

(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.

Thank you!

408k views408k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Apache Ignite
Apache Ignite

Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

Distributed and Highly Available Search Engine;Multi Tenant with Multi Types;Various set of APIs including RESTful;Clients available in many languages including Java, Python, .NET, C#, Groovy, and more;Document oriented;Reliable, Asynchronous Write Behind for long term persistency;(Near) Real Time Search;Built on top of Apache Lucene;Per operation consistency;Inverted indices with finite state transducers for full-text querying;BKD trees for storing numeric and geo data;Column store for analytics;Compatible with Hadoop using the ES-Hadoop connector;Open Source under Apache 2 and Elastic License
Memory-Centric Storage; Distributed SQL; Distributed Key-Value
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.9K
Stacks
35.0K
Stacks
99
Followers
27.1K
Followers
168
Votes
1.6K
Votes
41
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 329
    Powerful api
  • 315
    Great search engine
  • 231
    Open source
  • 214
    Restful
  • 200
    Near real-time search
Cons
  • 7
    Resource hungry
  • 6
    Diffecult to get started
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 4
    Hard to keep stable at large scale
Pros
  • 5
    Written in java. runs on jvm
  • 5
    Multiple client language support
  • 5
    High Avaliability
  • 5
    Free
  • 4
    Load balancing
Integrations
Kibana
Kibana
Beats
Beats
Logstash
Logstash
MongoDB
MongoDB
MySQL
MySQL
Apache Spark
Apache Spark

What are some alternatives to Elasticsearch, Apache Ignite?

Redis

Redis

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

Algolia

Algolia

Our mission is to make you a search expert. Push data to our API to make it searchable in real time. Build your dream front end with one of our web or mobile UI libraries. Tune relevance and get analytics right from your dashboard.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Typesense

Typesense

It is an open source, typo tolerant search engine that delivers fast and relevant results out-of-the-box. has been built from scratch to offer a delightful, out-of-the-box search experience. From instant search to autosuggest, to faceted search, it has got you covered.

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch

Amazon CloudSearch enables you to search large collections of data such as web pages, document files, forum posts, or product information. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create a search domain, upload the data you want to make searchable to Amazon CloudSearch, and the search service automatically provisions the required technology resources and deploys a highly tuned search index.

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service

Amazon Elasticsearch Service is a fully managed service that makes it easy for you to deploy, secure, and operate Elasticsearch at scale with zero down time.

Manticore Search

Manticore Search

It is a full-text search engine written in C++ and a fork of Sphinx Search. It's designed to be simple to use, light and fast, while allowing advanced full-text searching. Connectivity is provided via a MySQL compatible protocol or HTTP, making it easy to integrate.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase