StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Apache Ignite vs MongoDB

Apache Ignite vs MongoDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MongoDB
MongoDB
Stacks96.6K
Followers82.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars27.7K
Forks5.7K
Apache Ignite
Apache Ignite
Stacks110
Followers168
Votes41
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks1.9K

Apache Ignite vs MongoDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Ignite and MongoDB are two popular database systems with distinct features and use cases. While both databases handle data storage and retrieval, they have several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Data Model: Apache Ignite is an in-memory data grid that stores data in a distributed key-value store or as cached data. It supports SQL-like queries and indexing for efficient data retrieval. On the other hand, MongoDB is a document database that stores data in flexible, JSON-like documents. It allows for dynamic schema design and supports complex queries using the MongoDB Query Language.

  2. Scalability: Apache Ignite is designed for high scalability with horizontal data partitioning and distribution across multiple nodes. It leverages in-memory computing for fast data processing and can handle large datasets in real-time. MongoDB also supports horizontal scalability with sharding, where data is distributed across multiple servers. However, it might not be as performant as Ignite in handling massive, real-time workloads.

  3. Consistency Model: Apache Ignite provides strong consistency guarantees with ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) transactions. It ensures that data modifications across different nodes are resolved and kept in sync. MongoDB, on the other hand, offers eventual consistency by default, where data changes are eventually propagated to all replicas. It allows for faster write operations but might result in the possibility of reading stale data in some scenarios.

  4. Data Replication: Apache Ignite supports data replication with synchronous or asynchronous replication modes. It ensures data availability and fault tolerance by replicating data across multiple nodes. MongoDB also supports replication through replica sets, where data is automatically copied to multiple nodes. However, MongoDB provides more flexibility in configuring replication options with options like replica sets, sharded clusters, and hidden/inaccessible nodes.

  5. Indexing and Query Capabilities: Apache Ignite utilizes distributed indexes and a SQL-like query engine to perform fast data retrieval. It supports indexing on both primary and secondary keys, as well as full-text search capabilities. MongoDB, on the other hand, uses flexible and configurable indexing to optimize query performance. It allows for indexing on various data types and supports text search, geospatial queries, and even aggregation pipelines for complex data processing.

  6. Use Cases: Apache Ignite is well-suited for real-time analytics, high-performance computing, and applications requiring fast data access. It excels in scenarios where low latency and high-throughput processing are crucial. MongoDB, on the other hand, is primarily used for document storage and management. It is best suited for applications that require flexible data modeling, dynamic schemas, and horizontal scalability for handling large volumes of JSON-like documents.

In summary, Apache Ignite and MongoDB differ in their data models, scalability approaches, consistency models, data replication options, indexing/query capabilities, and use cases. Each database has its strengths and weaknesses, catering to different application requirements and workload characteristics.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on MongoDB, Apache Ignite

George
George

Student

Mar 18, 2020

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQLPythonPythonDjangoDjango

Hello everyone,

Well, I want to build a large-scale project, but I do not know which ORDBMS to choose. The app should handle real-time operations, not chatting, but things like future scheduling or reminders. It should be also really secure, fast and easy to use. And last but not least, should I use them both. I mean PostgreSQL with Python / Django and MongoDB with Node.js? Or would it be better to use PostgreSQL with Node.js?

*The project is going to use React for the front-end and GraphQL is going to be used for the API.

Thank you all. Any answer or advice would be really helpful!

620k views620k
Comments
Ido
Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

My data was inherently hierarchical, but there was not enough content in each level of the hierarchy to justify a relational DB (SQL) with a one-to-many approach. It was also far easier to share data between the frontend (Angular), backend (Node.js) and DB (MongoDB) as they all pass around JSON natively. This allowed me to skip the translation layer from relational to hierarchical. You do need to think about correct indexes in MongoDB, and make sure the objects have finite size. For instance, an object in your DB shouldn't have a property which is an array that grows over time, without limit. In addition, I did use MySQL for other types of data, such as a catalog of products which (a) has a lot of data, (b) flat and not hierarchical, (c) needed very fast queries.

575k views575k
Comments
Mike
Mike

Mar 20, 2020

Needs advice

We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

MongoDB
MongoDB
Apache Ignite
Apache Ignite

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

Flexible data model, expressive query language, secondary indexes, replication, auto-sharding, in-place updates, aggregation, GridFS
Memory-Centric Storage; Distributed SQL; Distributed Key-Value
Statistics
GitHub Stars
27.7K
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Forks
5.7K
GitHub Forks
1.9K
Stacks
96.6K
Stacks
110
Followers
82.0K
Followers
168
Votes
4.1K
Votes
41
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 829
    Document-oriented storage
  • 594
    No sql
  • 554
    Ease of use
  • 465
    Fast
  • 410
    High performance
Cons
  • 6
    Very slowly for connected models that require joins
  • 3
    Not acid compliant
  • 2
    Proprietary query language
Pros
  • 5
    Written in java. runs on jvm
  • 5
    Multiple client language support
  • 5
    Free
  • 5
    High Avaliability
  • 4
    Rest interface
Integrations
No integrations available
MySQL
MySQL
Apache Spark
Apache Spark

What are some alternatives to MongoDB, Apache Ignite?

Redis

Redis

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase