StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Apache Kudu vs Azure Synapse

Apache Kudu vs Azure Synapse

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Kudu
Apache Kudu
Stacks71
Followers259
Votes10
GitHub Stars828
Forks282
Azure Synapse
Azure Synapse
Stacks104
Followers230
Votes10

Apache Kudu vs Azure Synapse: What are the differences?

Introduction: Apache Kudu and Azure Synapse are two popular technologies in the field of big data analytics. Both offer a range of features and capabilities, but there are key differences between them that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Data Storage: Apache Kudu is a columnar storage engine that is optimized for analytics workloads, providing real-time analytics on rapidly changing data. On the other hand, Azure Synapse offers a unified analytics service that combines big data and data warehousing, providing a scalable and cost-effective solution for analyzing big data.

  2. Distributed Computing: Apache Kudu functions as a distributed data store that can scale horizontally, allowing for high-performance queries across huge datasets. In contrast, Azure Synapse leverages distributed computing to support parallel data processing, making it suitable for complex analytics tasks that require massive processing power.

  3. Query Processing: Apache Kudu supports SQL for querying data and integrates seamlessly with Apache Impala, enabling interactive analytics on rapidly changing data. Azure Synapse, on the other hand, supports T-SQL for querying data and includes a dedicated analytics engine that can handle complex queries against large datasets.

  4. Integration: Apache Kudu can be easily integrated with existing Hadoop ecosystem tools like Spark, Impala, and MapReduce, making it a popular choice for organizations with established big data workflows. In contrast, Azure Synapse integrates with various Microsoft Azure services, providing a seamless experience for organizations already using Azure cloud services.

  5. Data Partitioning: Apache Kudu allows for easy partitioning of data based on key ranges, which can improve query performance and optimize data storage. Azure Synapse supports data partitioning through distributions, enabling users to distribute data evenly across compute nodes for faster query processing.

  6. Data Security: Apache Kudu offers security features like authentication, authorization, and data encryption to protect sensitive data and ensure compliance with data privacy regulations. Azure Synapse provides robust security measures, including role-based access control (RBAC), encryption, and auditing capabilities to safeguard data across the platform.

In Summary, Apache Kudu and Azure Synapse differ in their data storage, distributed computing, query processing, integration, data partitioning, and data security capabilities, catering to different types of analytic workloads and business requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Kudu
Apache Kudu
Azure Synapse
Azure Synapse

A new addition to the open source Apache Hadoop ecosystem, Kudu completes Hadoop's storage layer to enable fast analytics on fast data.

It is an analytics service that brings together enterprise data warehousing and Big Data analytics. It gives you the freedom to query data on your terms, using either serverless on-demand or provisioned resources—at scale. It brings these two worlds together with a unified experience to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data for immediate BI and machine learning needs.

-
Complete T-SQL based analytics – Generally Available; Deeply integrated Apache Spark; Hybrid data integration; Unified user experience
Statistics
GitHub Stars
828
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
282
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
71
Stacks
104
Followers
259
Followers
230
Votes
10
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Realtime Analytics
Cons
  • 1
    Restart time
Pros
  • 4
    ETL
  • 3
    Security
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 1
    Doesn't support cross database query
Cons
  • 1
    Dictionary Size Limitation - CCI
  • 1
    Concurrency
Integrations
Hadoop
Hadoop
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Apache Kudu, Azure Synapse?

Metabase

Metabase

It is an easy way to generate charts and dashboards, ask simple ad hoc queries without using SQL, and see detailed information about rows in your Database. You can set it up in under 5 minutes, and then give yourself and others a place to ask simple questions and understand the data your application is generating.

Google BigQuery

Google BigQuery

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon EMR

Amazon EMR

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Superset

Superset

Superset's main goal is to make it easy to slice, dice and visualize data. It empowers users to perform analytics at the speed of thought.

Apache Flink

Apache Flink

Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase