StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Apache Parquet vs Chronix

Apache Parquet vs Chronix

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet
Stacks97
Followers190
Votes0
Chronix
Chronix
Stacks3
Followers12
Votes0
GitHub Stars266
Forks27

Apache Parquet vs Chronix: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Parquet and Chronix are both technologies used for storage and analysis of large data sets. However, there are several key differences between these two technologies.

  1. Data Structure: Apache Parquet is a columnar storage file format that organizes data into columns for efficient compression and query performance. On the other hand, Chronix is a time series database and indexing engine specifically designed for time series data.

  2. Querying Capabilities: Apache Parquet supports a wide range of query operations, including predicate pushdown, column pruning, and vectorized execution. It can efficiently handle complex and ad-hoc queries on large data sets. In contrast, Chronix focuses on time-based queries and provides specialized time series query operations for efficient retrieval and analysis of time series data.

  3. Compression Algorithms: Apache Parquet provides support for various compression algorithms, such as Snappy, Gzip, and LZO, allowing users to choose the most suitable compression method based on their requirements. Chronix also provides compression capabilities, but it primarily focuses on efficient storage and retrieval of time series data rather than offering a wide range of compression options.

  4. Data Partitioning: Apache Parquet supports data partitioning, which allows users to store and organize data based on specific criteria, such as a particular column or attribute. This enables efficient pruning and filtering of data during query execution. Chronix, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for data partitioning as it primarily focuses on time-based indexing and querying.

  5. Integration with Ecosystem: Apache Parquet is widely used in the Hadoop ecosystem and integrates well with various data processing frameworks like Apache Spark and Apache Hive. It provides seamless integration with these tools, enabling efficient data processing and analysis. Chronix, on the other hand, is not specifically designed for integration with the Hadoop ecosystem. It is a standalone time series database that can be used independently or integrated with other systems.

  6. Schema Evolution: Apache Parquet supports schema evolution, allowing users to update or add new columns to existing data sets without breaking compatibility with the previous versions. This flexibility is particularly useful in scenarios where the data schema evolves over time. Chronix, however, does not provide built-in support for schema evolution as it primarily focuses on time series data storage and querying.

In summary, Apache Parquet is a columnar storage file format that supports efficient compression, complex querying, data partitioning, integration with the Hadoop ecosystem, and schema evolution. On the other hand, Chronix is a time series database and indexing engine that focuses on specialized time series query operations and efficient storage and retrieval of time series data.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet
Chronix
Chronix

It is a columnar storage format available to any project in the Hadoop ecosystem, regardless of the choice of data processing framework, data model or programming language.

Chronix is built to store time series highly compressed and for fast access times. In comparison to related time series databases, Chronix does not only take 5 to 171 times less space, but it also shaves off 83% of the access time, and up to 78% off the runtime on a mix of real world queries.

Columnar storage format;Type-specific encoding; Pig integration; Cascading integration; Crunch integration; Apache Arrow integration; Apache Scrooge integration;Adaptive dictionary encoding; Predicate pushdown; Column stats
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
266
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
27
Stacks
97
Stacks
3
Followers
190
Followers
12
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Hadoop
Hadoop
Java
Java
Apache Impala
Apache Impala
Apache Thrift
Apache Thrift
Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Pig
Pig
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Apache Parquet, Chronix?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase