StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Apache Parquet vs Clickhouse

Apache Parquet vs Clickhouse

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet
Stacks97
Followers190
Votes0
Clickhouse
Clickhouse
Stacks433
Followers543
Votes85

Apache Parquet vs Clickhouse: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will explore the key differences between Apache Parquet and ClickHouse, two popular technologies used for data storage and processing.

  1. Performance: Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format that offers excellent performance for analytical processing. It uses a compression algorithm that reduces both disk space and I/O operations, resulting in faster query execution. ClickHouse, on the other hand, is a columnar database management system that is specifically designed for high-performance analytics. It leverages various optimizations like vectorized query execution and efficient data compression to achieve exceptional processing speeds.

  2. Data Compression: Apache Parquet employs a compact, efficient compression scheme that minimizes the storage space required for data representation. It supports a variety of compression codecs such as Snappy, Gzip, and LZO, allowing users to choose the most suitable option for their specific use case. ClickHouse also provides powerful compression capabilities, using a combination of various techniques like delta coding, LZ4, and LZ77. This results in significant reduction in data size and consequently faster query processing.

  3. Supported Data Types: Apache Parquet supports a wide range of data types, including primitive types like integers, floating-point numbers, booleans, and strings, as well as complex types like arrays, maps, and structs. ClickHouse, on the other hand, offers support for a similar set of data types, with the addition of several specialized types like UUID, IPv4, and IPv6. This comprehensive support for diverse data types makes both Parquet and ClickHouse suitable for handling complex datasets.

  4. Query Language: Apache Parquet does not have its own query language. It is typically used in conjunction with other tools and frameworks like Apache Hive or Apache Spark, which provide SQL-like query capabilities. On the other hand, ClickHouse has its own query language called ClickHouse SQL. This language is specifically designed for analytical queries and provides a rich set of SQL features, including window functions, aggregate functions, and advanced join capabilities.

  5. Data Partitioning: Apache Parquet supports partitioning of data based on one or more columns. Partitioning allows for efficient data pruning and improves query performance by minimizing the amount of data read from disk. ClickHouse also supports partitioning, but it takes a different approach. It uses a concept called 'sharding' where the data is divided across multiple physical servers. This allows for parallel processing of queries and enables horizontal scalability.

  6. Data Replication and High Availability: ClickHouse supports data replication and high availability out of the box. It uses a replication mechanism called 'replicas' where multiple copies of data are stored across different servers. This ensures data durability and fault tolerance in case of hardware failures. Apache Parquet, on the other hand, is simply a file format and does not provide built-in replication or high availability features. It is typically used in conjunction with distributed storage systems like Apache Hadoop or distributed file systems like Apache HDFS.

In Summary, Apache Parquet and ClickHouse differ in terms of performance, data compression, supported data types, query language, data partitioning, and data replication/high availability. These differences make them suitable for different use cases, with Apache Parquet excelling in data storage and inter-operability, while ClickHouse is specifically designed for high-performance analytics.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet
Clickhouse
Clickhouse

It is a columnar storage format available to any project in the Hadoop ecosystem, regardless of the choice of data processing framework, data model or programming language.

It allows analysis of data that is updated in real time. It offers instant results in most cases: the data is processed faster than it takes to create a query.

Columnar storage format;Type-specific encoding; Pig integration; Cascading integration; Crunch integration; Apache Arrow integration; Apache Scrooge integration;Adaptive dictionary encoding; Predicate pushdown; Column stats
-
Statistics
Stacks
97
Stacks
433
Followers
190
Followers
543
Votes
0
Votes
85
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 21
    Fast, very very fast
  • 11
    Good compression ratio
  • 7
    Horizontally scalable
  • 6
    Utilizes all CPU resources
  • 5
    Great CLI
Cons
  • 5
    Slow insert operations
Integrations
Hadoop
Hadoop
Java
Java
Apache Impala
Apache Impala
Apache Thrift
Apache Thrift
Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Pig
Pig
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Apache Parquet, Clickhouse?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase