StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Apache Parquet vs Google Cloud Data Fusion

Apache Parquet vs Google Cloud Data Fusion

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet
Stacks97
Followers190
Votes0
Google Cloud Data Fusion
Google Cloud Data Fusion
Stacks25
Followers156
Votes1

Apache Parquet vs Google Cloud Data Fusion: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Apache Parquet and Google Cloud Data Fusion

Apache Parquet and Google Cloud Data Fusion are both tools commonly used in data processing and analytics. While they have some similarities, there are key differences that make each suitable for specific use cases. 

1. **File Format**: Apache Parquet is a file format optimized for columnar storage, allowing for efficient compression and encoding of data. On the other hand, Google Cloud Data Fusion is a fully managed data integration service that can work with a variety of file formats, not limited to Parquet.
   
2. **Deployment**: Apache Parquet requires users to install and configure the necessary infrastructure for data processing. In contrast, Google Cloud Data Fusion is a fully managed service provided by Google Cloud, eliminating the need for infrastructure setup and maintenance.

3. **Scalability**: Apache Parquet is scalable but requires manual scaling and optimization by users based on their needs. Google Cloud Data Fusion, on the other hand, provides seamless scalability, adapting resources automatically based on the workload.

4. **Data Processing**: Apache Parquet mainly focuses on storing and processing data efficiently, while Google Cloud Data Fusion provides a complete end-to-end data integration solution, including data transformation, orchestration, and monitoring.

5. **Integration**: Apache Parquet is a file format that can be integrated with various data processing frameworks, while Google Cloud Data Fusion integrates seamlessly with other Google Cloud services for a more comprehensive data solution.

6. **Pricing Model**: Apache Parquet is an open-source file format, free to use, while Google Cloud Data Fusion is a paid service with pricing based on usage and resources utilized by the users.

In Summary, Apache Parquet offers optimized columnar storage for efficient data processing, while Google Cloud Data Fusion is a fully managed service with comprehensive data integration capabilities for seamless processing and analysis.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet
Google Cloud Data Fusion
Google Cloud Data Fusion

It is a columnar storage format available to any project in the Hadoop ecosystem, regardless of the choice of data processing framework, data model or programming language.

A fully managed, cloud-native data integration service that helps users efficiently build and manage ETL/ELT data pipelines. With a graphical interface and a broad open-source library of preconfigured connectors and transformations, and more.

Columnar storage format;Type-specific encoding; Pig integration; Cascading integration; Crunch integration; Apache Arrow integration; Apache Scrooge integration;Adaptive dictionary encoding; Predicate pushdown; Column stats
Code-free self-service; Collaborative data engineering; GCP-native; Enterprise-grade security; Integration metadata and lineage; Seamless operations; Comprehensive integration toolkit; Hybrid enablement
Statistics
Stacks
97
Stacks
25
Followers
190
Followers
156
Votes
0
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Lower total cost of pipeline ownership
Integrations
Hadoop
Hadoop
Java
Java
Apache Impala
Apache Impala
Apache Thrift
Apache Thrift
Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Pig
Pig
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery

What are some alternatives to Apache Parquet, Google Cloud Data Fusion?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase