StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Apache Parquet vs LevelDB

Apache Parquet vs LevelDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

LevelDB
LevelDB
Stacks108
Followers111
Votes0
GitHub Stars38.3K
Forks8.1K
Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet
Stacks97
Followers190
Votes0

Apache Parquet vs LevelDB: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Apache Parquet and LevelDB

Apache Parquet and LevelDB are both storage technologies used in various data processing and storage systems. Here are the key differences between the two:

1. **Data Structure**: Apache Parquet is a columnar storage file format that stores data in columns rather than rows, allowing for more efficient data retrieval and processing. On the other hand, LevelDB is a key-value storage library that organizes data in key-value pairs, providing faster access to individual records but may not be as efficient for analytical processing of large datasets.

2. **Use Cases**: Apache Parquet is commonly used in big data processing frameworks like Apache Spark and Apache Hive for storing and analyzing large datasets. It is optimized for read-heavy workloads and is well-suited for data warehousing and analytics applications. LevelDB, on the other hand, is more commonly used in embedded systems, local storage databases, and other applications that require fast key-value lookups and low latency access to data.

3. **Performance**: In terms of performance, Apache Parquet excels in analytical workloads that involve scanning large amounts of data. Its columnar storage format enables efficient compression and encoding techniques, making it ideal for processing massive datasets quickly. LevelDB, on the other hand, offers lower latency for individual record access and high write throughput, making it suitable for use cases that require fast reads and writes to a small to moderate-sized dataset.

4. **Durability and Fault Tolerance**: Apache Parquet is typically used in distributed file systems like Hadoop HDFS, which provide durability and fault tolerance by replicating data across multiple nodes. This ensures data reliability and availability in case of node failures. LevelDB, on the other hand, is a local storage engine that may not offer the same level of fault tolerance as distributed file systems, making it more suitable for single-node or standalone applications.

5. **Data Encoding and Compression**: Apache Parquet uses advanced encoding and compression techniques like dictionary encoding, run-length encoding, and delta encoding to minimize storage space and improve query performance. These optimizations make Parquet highly efficient for data analytics and processing. In contrast, LevelDB focuses on providing fast access to individual keys and values, without emphasizing heavy compression or encoding schemes, making it simple and fast for key-value lookups.

6. **Scalability and Clustering**: Apache Parquet is designed to be highly scalable and can efficiently handle large datasets across distributed computing clusters. It can leverage parallel processing and distributed storage systems to process data in a distributed and fault-tolerant manner. LevelDB, on the other hand, is more suited for standalone or single-node deployments and may not scale as effectively in distributed or clustered environments.

In Summary, Apache Parquet and LevelDB differ in their data structures, use cases, performance characteristics, durability and fault tolerance, data encoding and compression strategies, as well as scalability and clustering capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

LevelDB
LevelDB
Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet

It is a fast key-value storage library written at Google that provides an ordered mapping from string keys to string values. It has been ported to a variety of Unix-based systems, macOS, Windows, and Android.

It is a columnar storage format available to any project in the Hadoop ecosystem, regardless of the choice of data processing framework, data model or programming language.

Simple key-value stores with Go, C++, Node.js and more!
Columnar storage format;Type-specific encoding; Pig integration; Cascading integration; Crunch integration; Apache Arrow integration; Apache Scrooge integration;Adaptive dictionary encoding; Predicate pushdown; Column stats
Statistics
GitHub Stars
38.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
8.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
108
Stacks
97
Followers
111
Followers
190
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Java
Java
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS
Hadoop
Hadoop
Java
Java
Apache Impala
Apache Impala
Apache Thrift
Apache Thrift
Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Pig
Pig

What are some alternatives to LevelDB, Apache Parquet?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase