StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Apache Parquet vs RocksDB

Apache Parquet vs RocksDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

RocksDB
RocksDB
Stacks141
Followers290
Votes11
GitHub Stars30.9K
Forks6.6K
Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet
Stacks97
Followers190
Votes0

Apache Parquet vs RocksDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Parquet and RocksDB are two different technologies used in the field of data storage and processing. While both serve a similar purpose, they have key differences in terms of their functionality and use cases.

  1. Storage Format: Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format that is optimized for use in big data processing systems. It is designed to efficiently store and retrieve large amounts of structured and semi-structured data. On the other hand, RocksDB is a key-value store that is optimized for high performance and low latency. It is typically used for transactional workloads that require fast and random access to data.

  2. Data Organization: Parquet organizes data in a columnar format, where each column is stored separately, allowing for efficient compression and pruning of data during query execution. RocksDB, on the other hand, organizes data in key-value pairs, where each key is associated with a value. This allows for fast lookups and updates of individual records.

  3. Data Types: Parquet supports a wide range of data types, including primitive types (such as integers, floats, and booleans) as well as complex types (such as arrays and structs). RocksDB, on the other hand, is a schema-less storage engine, which means it can store any type of value, including complex data structures like JSON or binary blobs.

  4. Data Access: Parquet is typically used in conjunction with big data processing frameworks like Apache Spark or Apache Hive. It provides efficient data access for analytical workloads, where queries are executed on large datasets in parallel. RocksDB, on the other hand, is often used in embedded systems or as a persistent cache, where fast and low-latency data access is critical.

  5. Durability and Fault Tolerance: Parquet is designed to be durable and fault-tolerant, with support for data replication and data recovery mechanisms. It can be used in distributed storage systems to ensure that data is not lost in the event of hardware failures or network partitions. RocksDB, on the other hand, focuses on providing high performance and low latency, with support for ACID transactions and write-ahead logging.

  6. Scalability: Parquet is a scalable storage format that can handle large volumes of data across multiple nodes in a distributed system. It can efficiently store and process data in parallel, making it suitable for large-scale analytical workloads. RocksDB, on the other hand, is optimized for single-node deployments and is not designed to scale horizontally across multiple machines.

In Summary, Apache Parquet and RocksDB differ in their storage format, data organization, data types, data access patterns, durability, fault tolerance, and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

RocksDB
RocksDB
Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet

RocksDB is an embeddable persistent key-value store for fast storage. RocksDB can also be the foundation for a client-server database but our current focus is on embedded workloads. RocksDB builds on LevelDB to be scalable to run on servers with many CPU cores, to efficiently use fast storage, to support IO-bound, in-memory and write-once workloads, and to be flexible to allow for innovation.

It is a columnar storage format available to any project in the Hadoop ecosystem, regardless of the choice of data processing framework, data model or programming language.

Designed for application servers wanting to store up to a few terabytes of data on locally attached Flash drives or in RAM;Optimized for storing small to medium size key-values on fast storage -- flash devices or in-memory;Scales linearly with number of CPUs so that it works well on ARM processors
Columnar storage format;Type-specific encoding; Pig integration; Cascading integration; Crunch integration; Apache Arrow integration; Apache Scrooge integration;Adaptive dictionary encoding; Predicate pushdown; Column stats
Statistics
GitHub Stars
30.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
141
Stacks
97
Followers
290
Followers
190
Votes
11
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Very fast
  • 3
    Made by Facebook
  • 2
    Consistent performance
  • 1
    Ability to add logic to the database layer where needed
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Hadoop
Hadoop
Java
Java
Apache Impala
Apache Impala
Apache Thrift
Apache Thrift
Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Pig
Pig

What are some alternatives to RocksDB, Apache Parquet?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase