StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Apache Parquet vs s3-lambda

Apache Parquet vs s3-lambda

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet
Stacks97
Followers190
Votes0
s3-lambda
s3-lambda
Stacks4
Followers64
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.1K
Forks47

Apache Parquet vs s3-lambda: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Parquet and s3-lambda are two popular technologies used for data storage and processing. Both have their unique features and functionalities that cater to different needs in the realm of big data analytics.

  1. Data Format: Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format optimized for queries, while s3-lambda is a serverless compute service that automatically scales to support existing workloads or new workloads. Parquet uses a compressed, efficient binary encoding to store data, making it highly efficient for analytics queries. On the other hand, s3-lambda provides the flexibility to process data on demand without provisioning or managing servers, making it suitable for processing tasks.

  2. Performance: In terms of performance, Apache Parquet offers faster query response times due to its columnar storage design. This design allows for the scanning of only relevant columns during query execution, reducing data retrieval time significantly. s3-lambda, on the other hand, provides high scalability and parallel processing capabilities, enabling it to handle large workloads efficiently.

  3. Cost: When it comes to cost, s3-lambda follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the amount of compute resources consumed, making it a cost-effective option for sporadic or unpredictable workloads. Apache Parquet, on the other hand, requires upfront investment in storage infrastructure but can result in cost savings in the long run due to its optimized query performance and storage efficiency.

  4. Integration with Ecosystem: Apache Parquet is widely supported by various big data processing frameworks such as Apache Spark, Hive, and Impala, making it easy to integrate into existing data processing pipelines. On the other hand, s3-lambda seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, allowing for easy data processing workflows within the AWS ecosystem.

  5. Data Storage: While Apache Parquet stores data in a distributed file system or cloud storage, s3-lambda stores data directly in AWS S3 buckets. This difference in data storage methods can impact data accessibility, retrieval speeds, and overall data management strategies based on the specific use case requirements.

  6. Data Processing Approach: Apache Parquet optimizes data for analytics queries through its columnar storage design, focusing on efficient data retrieval and processing. In contrast, s3-lambda enables event-driven processing, where compute resources are automatically triggered and scaled based on defined events or triggers, allowing for efficient and flexible data processing on-demand.

In Summary, Apache Parquet and s3-lambda offer distinct advantages in terms of data format, performance, cost, integration with ecosystems, data storage, and data processing approaches in the realm of data analytics and processing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet
s3-lambda
s3-lambda

It is a columnar storage format available to any project in the Hadoop ecosystem, regardless of the choice of data processing framework, data model or programming language.

s3-lambda enables you to run lambda functions over a context of S3 objects. It has a stateless architecture with concurrency control, allowing you to process a large number of files very quickly. This is useful for quickly prototyping complex data jobs without an infrastructure like Hadoop or Spark.

Columnar storage format;Type-specific encoding; Pig integration; Cascading integration; Crunch integration; Apache Arrow integration; Apache Scrooge integration;Adaptive dictionary encoding; Predicate pushdown; Column stats
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
47
Stacks
97
Stacks
4
Followers
190
Followers
64
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Hadoop
Hadoop
Java
Java
Apache Impala
Apache Impala
Apache Thrift
Apache Thrift
Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Pig
Pig
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda

What are some alternatives to Apache Parquet, s3-lambda?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase