StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Apache Struts vs CodeIgniter

Apache Struts vs CodeIgniter

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
Stacks3.2K
Followers1.5K
Votes466
Apache Struts
Apache Struts
Stacks61
Followers57
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks833

Apache Struts vs CodeIgniter: What are the differences?

Apache Struts and CodeIgniter are both popular PHP frameworks used for web development. They offer a wide range of features and tools that make developing web applications easier and more efficient. 

1. **Architecture**: Apache Struts follows the Model View Controller (MVC) architecture, which separates the logic of the application into three interconnected components. On the other hand, CodeIgniter follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) design pattern, which allows for a more flexible and modular approach to web development.
2. **Learning Curve**: Apache Struts is known to have a steeper learning curve compared to CodeIgniter. This is due to its extensive configuration files and complex structure, which may be challenging for beginners. CodeIgniter, on the other hand, is more straightforward and easier to understand, making it more suitable for developers of all levels.
3. **Community Support**: CodeIgniter has a larger and more active community compared to Apache Struts. This means that developers using CodeIgniter can easily find help, resources, and updates online, making it a more supported and sustainable framework in the long run.
4. **Built-in Features**: CodeIgniter comes with a wide range of built-in libraries and helpers that make common tasks simpler and more efficient. Apache Struts, on the other hand, requires developers to configure and integrate external libraries to achieve the same functionality, making the development process more time-consuming.
5. **Performance**: In terms of performance, CodeIgniter is known to be faster and more lightweight compared to Apache Struts. This is due to its minimalistic approach and efficient resource management, which results in quicker load times and better overall performance for web applications.
6. **Flexibility**: CodeIgniter offers more flexibility and freedom in terms of coding style and practices, allowing developers to choose the tools and techniques that best suit their project requirements. Apache Struts, on the other hand, has more rigid conventions and guidelines, which may limit developers in certain aspects of their development process.

In Summary, Apache Struts and CodeIgniter differ in their architecture, learning curve, community support, built-in features, performance, and flexibility, making them suitable for different types of developers and projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CodeIgniter, Apache Struts

Ajeet
Ajeet

Dec 16, 2019

Needs advice

Hi, We are thinking to rebuild a website and need your suggestion on which platform to choose from NodeJs, Laravel & CodeIgnitor. Since it's an education base website and there will be multiple functionalities like the use of graphics, video, animation and off-course forms for lead generation. Please advise us which tool to use to build the website considering load-time, server security, code vulnerability, etc.

216k views216k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
Apache Struts
Apache Struts

CodeIgniter is a proven, agile & open PHP web application framework with a small footprint. It is powering the next generation of web apps.

It is a free, open-source, MVC framework for creating elegant, modern Java web applications. It favors convention over configuration, is extensible using a plugin architecture, and ships with plugins to support REST, AJAX and JSON.

-
MVC framework; extensible using a plugin architecture; ships with plugins to support REST, AJAX and JSON
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
833
Stacks
3.2K
Stacks
61
Followers
1.5K
Followers
57
Votes
466
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 88
    Mvc
  • 76
    Easy setup
  • 70
    Open source
  • 62
    Well documented
  • 36
    Community support
Cons
  • 6
    No ORM
  • 1
    No CLI
No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP
PHP
AngularJS
AngularJS
Java
Java
Hibernate
Hibernate

What are some alternatives to CodeIgniter, Apache Struts?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase