StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET vs Apache Struts

.NET vs Apache Struts

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

.NET
.NET
Stacks15.4K
Followers5.9K
Votes1.9K
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K
Apache Struts
Apache Struts
Stacks61
Followers57
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks833

.NET vs Apache Struts: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Language compatibility**: .NET is designed to work with languages like C#, VB.NET, and F# within the .NET framework, while Apache Struts predominantly works with Java-based applications, making it less versatile in terms of programming language support. 
2. **Technology stack**: .NET provides a more comprehensive technology stack, including various libraries, frameworks, and tools, which might make it more convenient for developers to work with, whereas Apache Struts focuses primarily on providing a web framework for Java developers, with less emphasis on a broader technology stack.
3. **Development philosophy**: .NET is built on the principles of object-oriented programming, with a focus on code reusability and scalability, while Apache Struts follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) design pattern, which separates the application into three interconnected components.
4. **Community support**: .NET has a strong backing from Microsoft and a large developer community, which results in regular updates, support, and a vast pool of resources, in contrast to Apache Struts, which relies more on the open-source community for support and updates.
5. **Platform independence**: .NET is primarily designed for Windows-based systems and applications, although there are efforts to make it more platform-independent, whereas Apache Struts is known for its platform independence and can run on various operating systems.
6. **Deployment flexibility**: .NET applications are typically deployed on Microsoft platforms, such as IIS (Internet Information Services), while Apache Struts applications can be deployed on a wide range of web servers, providing more flexibility in deployment options.

In Summary, .NET and Apache Struts differ in language compatibility, technology stack, development philosophy, community support, platform independence, and deployment flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on .NET, Apache Struts

Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET
.NET
Apache Struts
Apache Struts

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

It is a free, open-source, MVC framework for creating elegant, modern Java web applications. It favors convention over configuration, is extensible using a plugin architecture, and ships with plugins to support REST, AJAX and JSON.

Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.
MVC framework; extensible using a plugin architecture; ships with plugins to support REST, AJAX and JSON
Statistics
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
833
Stacks
15.4K
Stacks
61
Followers
5.9K
Followers
57
Votes
1.9K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 273
    Tight integration with visual studio
  • 262
    Stable code
  • 191
    Great community
  • 184
    Reliable and strongly typed server side language.
  • 141
    Microsoft
Cons
  • 13
    C#
  • 12
    Too expensive to deploy and maintain
  • 8
    Microsoft dependable systems
  • 8
    Microsoft itself
  • 5
    Hard learning curve
No community feedback yet
Integrations
C#
C#
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
F#
F#
Xamarin
Xamarin
Visual Basic
Visual Basic
AngularJS
AngularJS
Java
Java
Hibernate
Hibernate

What are some alternatives to .NET, Apache Struts?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase