Overview

Next.js

Stacks8.0K

Followers5.1K

Votes330

GitHub Stars135.4K

Forks29.7K

Apache Struts

Stacks61

Followers57

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.3K

Forks833

Apache Struts vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Introduction: Apache Struts and Next.js are both popular frameworks used in web development, with each serving different purposes and offering distinct features. Understanding the key differences between these two frameworks can help developers make informed decisions when choosing the right tool for their project.

Architecture: Apache Struts is a Java-based web application framework that follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architectural pattern, providing a structured way to separate concerns and organize code. On the other hand, Next.js is a React-based framework for building static and server-side rendered web applications, focusing on performance and developer experience.
Language: Apache Struts is primarily used for developing Java web applications, making it suitable for Java developers. In contrast, Next.js is based on JavaScript and React, which are widely used technologies in the modern web development landscape, allowing for easier adoption by developers familiar with these languages.
Scalability: Apache Struts is known for its scalability and is commonly used in enterprise-level applications due to its robust architecture and extensive features. On the other hand, Next.js is designed to be highly scalable and performant, especially for static site generation, making it a good choice for projects that require fast loading times and efficient rendering.
Community Support: Apache Struts, being an established framework, has a large community of developers and contributors, providing ample resources, documentation, and libraries for developers. Next.js, although relatively newer, also has a growing community and ecosystem, with active development and support from the creators and the open-source community.
Deployment Options: Apache Struts applications are typically deployed on Java application servers, such as Apache Tomcat or JBoss, requiring a Java runtime environment. In contrast, Next.js applications can be deployed on any server that supports Node.js, offering more flexibility in deployment options and making it easier to host on platforms like Vercel or Netlify.
Routing: Apache Struts uses configuration-based routing, where developers define mappings between URL patterns and controller actions in an XML configuration file. Next.js, on the other hand, utilizes file-system-based routing, allowing developers to create pages simply by adding files to the pages directory, making it more intuitive and easier to manage routing in the application.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Apache Struts and Next.js, such as architecture, language, scalability, community support, deployment options, and routing, can help developers choose the right framework based on their project requirements and familiarity with the technology stack.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

VitePress Frameworks

VitePress

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

2

Advice on Next.js, Apache Struts

Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Next.js	Apache Struts
Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.	It is a free, open-source, MVC framework for creating elegant, modern Java web applications. It favors convention over configuration, is extensible using a plugin architecture, and ships with plugins to support REST, AJAX and JSON.
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment	MVC framework; extensible using a plugin architecture; ships with plugins to support REST, AJAX and JSON
Statistics
GitHub Stars 135.4K	GitHub Stars 1.3K
GitHub Forks 29.7K	GitHub Forks 833
Stacks 8.0K	Stacks 61
Followers 5.1K	Followers 57
Votes 330	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 51 Automatic server rendering and code splitting 44 Built with React 34 Easy setup 26 TypeScript 24 Universal JavaScript Cons 9 Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)	No community feedback yet
Integrations
React	AngularJS Java Hibernate

What are some alternatives to Next.js, Apache Struts?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.