Apache Struts vs PHP-MVC

Overview

PHP-MVC

Stacks106

Followers222

Votes3

Apache Struts

Stacks61

Followers57

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.3K

Forks833

Apache Struts vs PHP-MVC: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this markdown code, we will be discussing the key differences between Apache Struts and PHP-MVC. Both Apache Struts and PHP-MVC are popular frameworks used for developing web applications. However, they have some distinct differences that set them apart from each other.

Architecture: Apache Struts follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, which separates the application into three components - model, view, and controller. PHP-MVC, on the other hand, is a lightweight framework that follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern but with a simplified architecture.
Language Support: Apache Struts can be used with various programming languages, including Java, Groovy, and Scala. PHP-MVC, as the name suggests, is specifically designed for the PHP programming language.
Community and Support: Apache Struts has been around for a longer time and has a larger community and support system compared to PHP-MVC. This means that finding resources, documentation, and help for Apache Struts is generally easier.
Extensibility: Apache Struts provides a wide range of plugins and extensions that can be easily integrated into the framework. PHP-MVC, being a lightweight framework, may have limited options for extending its functionality compared to Apache Struts.
Learning Curve: Due to its simplicity, PHP-MVC has a relatively shorter learning curve compared to Apache Struts. Apache Struts, being a more comprehensive framework, may require more time and effort to understand and master.
Popularity and Usage: Apache Struts has been widely adopted by large enterprises and is known for its scalability and robustness. PHP-MVC, on the other hand, is popular among developers who prefer a lightweight and fast framework for their PHP-based applications.

In summary, Apache Struts and PHP-MVC differ in terms of architecture, language support, community support, extensibility, learning curve, and popularity. The choice between the two frameworks ultimately depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the development team or individual developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

PHP-MVC	Apache Struts
This project is - by intention - NOT a full framework, it's a bare-bone structure, written in purely native PHP ! The php-mvc skeleton tries to be the extremely slimmed down opposite of big frameworks like Zend2, Symfony or Laravel.	It is a free, open-source, MVC framework for creating elegant, modern Java web applications. It favors convention over configuration, is extensible using a plugin architecture, and ships with plugins to support REST, AJAX and JSON.
-	MVC framework; extensible using a plugin architecture; ships with plugins to support REST, AJAX and JSON
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 1.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 833
Stacks 106	Stacks 61
Followers 222	Followers 57
Votes 3	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Easy to Learn	No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP	AngularJS Java Hibernate

What are some alternatives to PHP-MVC, Apache Struts?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Apache Struts vs PHP-MVC: What are the differences?

Architecture: Apache Struts follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, which separates the application into three components - model, view, and controller. PHP-MVC, on the other hand, is a lightweight framework that follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern but with a simplified architecture.
Language Support: Apache Struts can be used with various programming languages, including Java, Groovy, and Scala. PHP-MVC, as the name suggests, is specifically designed for the PHP programming language.
Community and Support: Apache Struts has been around for a longer time and has a larger community and support system compared to PHP-MVC. This means that finding resources, documentation, and help for Apache Struts is generally easier.
Extensibility: Apache Struts provides a wide range of plugins and extensions that can be easily integrated into the framework. PHP-MVC, being a lightweight framework, may have limited options for extending its functionality compared to Apache Struts.
Learning Curve: Due to its simplicity, PHP-MVC has a relatively shorter learning curve compared to Apache Struts. Apache Struts, being a more comprehensive framework, may require more time and effort to understand and master.
Popularity and Usage: Apache Struts has been widely adopted by large enterprises and is known for its scalability and robustness. PHP-MVC, on the other hand, is popular among developers who prefer a lightweight and fast framework for their PHP-based applications.

Apache Struts vs PHP-MVC

Overview