Apache Wicket vs GWT

Overview

Apache Wicket

Stacks61

Followers54

Votes2

GWT

Stacks88

Followers100

Votes0

Apache Wicket vs GWT: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Apache Wicket and Google Web Toolkit (GWT) are both powerful frameworks used for web application development. While they both aim to simplify the process of building web applications, they have key differences that developers should consider when choosing between them.

Architecture: Apache Wicket follows the component-based architecture, where UI components are created and composed using Java code and HTML templates. On the other hand, GWT follows a widget-based architecture, where UI components are created using a combination of Java code and a special XML-based UI declaration format.
Language: Apache Wicket allows developers to build web applications using only Java, making it easier for Java developers to work on the codebase. In contrast, GWT allows developers to write client-side code in Java and convert it into optimized JavaScript code during compilation, providing high performance and cross-browser compatibility.
Development Tooling: GWT provides a set of development tools, including a powerful Java-to-JavaScript compiler, debugging tools, and cross-browser testing capabilities. In comparison, Apache Wicket does not have specific development tools tailored for it, relying more on general Java IDEs and other web development tools.
Client-Side Interaction: GWT excels in handling client-side interactions efficiently, offering features like RPC (Remote Procedure Call) for server communication, event handling, and animations. Apache Wicket, while also capable of client-side logic, tends to focus more on server-side processing and rendering.
Community Support: GWT, being backed by Google, has a larger community and ecosystem, with extensive documentation, forums, and third-party libraries. Apache Wicket, while having an active community, may not have the same level of resources and support available.

In Summary, Apache Wicket and GWT differ in terms of architecture, language support, development tooling, client-side interaction capabilities, and community support, making it essential for developers to carefully assess their requirements before choosing between the two frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Wicket	GWT
It is a component-based web application framework for the Java programming language conceptually similar to JavaServer Faces and Tapestry.	It is a development toolkit for building and optimizing complex browser-based applications. Its goal is to enable productive development of high-performance web applications without the developer having to be an expert in browser quirks, XMLHttpRequest, and JavaScript.
Just Java & HTML;Secure by Default;AJAX Components;Open Source with Apache License;Maintainable code; JavaEE integration	-
Statistics
Stacks 61	Stacks 88
Followers 54	Followers 100
Votes 2	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Java 1 Component based	No community feedback yet
Integrations
IntelliJ IDEA JavaScript HTML5 CSS 3 NetBeans IDE Java 8 Java EE Eclipse	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Apache Wicket, GWT?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Related Comparisons

Apache Wicket vs GWT: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Architecture: Apache Wicket follows the component-based architecture, where UI components are created and composed using Java code and HTML templates. On the other hand, GWT follows a widget-based architecture, where UI components are created using a combination of Java code and a special XML-based UI declaration format.
Language: Apache Wicket allows developers to build web applications using only Java, making it easier for Java developers to work on the codebase. In contrast, GWT allows developers to write client-side code in Java and convert it into optimized JavaScript code during compilation, providing high performance and cross-browser compatibility.
Development Tooling: GWT provides a set of development tools, including a powerful Java-to-JavaScript compiler, debugging tools, and cross-browser testing capabilities. In comparison, Apache Wicket does not have specific development tools tailored for it, relying more on general Java IDEs and other web development tools.
Client-Side Interaction: GWT excels in handling client-side interactions efficiently, offering features like RPC (Remote Procedure Call) for server communication, event handling, and animations. Apache Wicket, while also capable of client-side logic, tends to focus more on server-side processing and rendering.
Community Support: GWT, being backed by Google, has a larger community and ecosystem, with extensive documentation, forums, and third-party libraries. Apache Wicket, while having an active community, may not have the same level of resources and support available.

Apache Wicket vs GWT

Overview