Apache Wicket vs React

Overview

React

Stacks182.6K

Followers147.0K

Votes4.1K

GitHub Stars240.3K

Forks49.7K

Apache Wicket

Stacks61

Followers54

Votes2

Apache Wicket vs React: What are the differences?

Apache Wicket vs React

Apache Wicket and React are two popular frameworks used in web development, but they have significant differences in their approaches and functionality. Here are the key differences between Apache Wicket and React:

Architecture and Design Patterns: Apache Wicket follows a server-side rendering approach, where most of the processing takes place on the server and the rendered HTML is sent to the client. On the other hand, React is a client-side rendering library that allows for building interactive user interfaces using a component-based architecture.
Programming Language: Apache Wicket is primarily used with Java, leveraging the power of the Java ecosystem and libraries. React, on the other hand, is primarily used with JavaScript, making it more accessible to a wider range of developers.
State Management: Apache Wicket handles state management on the server-side, where the server keeps track of the state of components and updates the HTML sent to the client accordingly. React, on the other hand, manages state on the client-side using a virtual DOM and a one-way data flow, making it more efficient for handling complex user interfaces.
Reusability and Componentization: Apache Wicket encourages the reuse of components and provides a rich set of reusable UI components out-of-the-box. React takes reusability to the next level with its component-based architecture, allowing developers to create highly modular and reusable UI components.
Ecosystem and Community: Apache Wicket has been around for quite some time and has a mature ecosystem and a dedicated community of developers, making it a reliable choice for enterprise applications. React, on the other hand, has gained immense popularity in recent years and has a vibrant ecosystem with a wide range of tools, libraries, and community support.
Learning Curve and Ease of Use: Apache Wicket has a steeper learning curve due to its Java-based approach and the need to understand the server-side rendering model. React, on the other hand, has a relatively lower learning curve for developers familiar with JavaScript, and its declarative nature makes it easier to write and understand code.

In summary, Apache Wicket and React differ in their approach to web development, programming language, state management, reusability, ecosystem, and ease of use. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the project and the preferences and expertise of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on React, Apache Wicket

Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceon

Vue.js

React

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k

Comments

Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k

Comments

Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

React	Apache Wicket
Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.	It is a component-based web application framework for the Java programming language conceptually similar to JavaServer Faces and Tapestry.
Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere	Just Java & HTML;Secure by Default;AJAX Components;Open Source with Apache License;Maintainable code; JavaEE integration
Statistics
GitHub Stars 240.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 49.7K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 182.6K	Stacks 61
Followers 147.0K	Followers 54
Votes 4.1K	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
Pros 837 Components 674 Virtual dom 579 Performance 509 Simplicity 442 Composable Cons 41 Requires discipline to keep architecture organized 30 No predefined way to structure your app 29 Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages 13 JSX 10 Not enterprise friendly	Pros 1 Component based 1 Java
Integrations
No integrations available	IntelliJ IDEA JavaScript HTML5 CSS 3 NetBeans IDE Java 8 Java EE Eclipse

What are some alternatives to React, Apache Wicket?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Related Comparisons

Apache Wicket vs React: What are the differences?

Apache Wicket vs React

Architecture and Design Patterns: Apache Wicket follows a server-side rendering approach, where most of the processing takes place on the server and the rendered HTML is sent to the client. On the other hand, React is a client-side rendering library that allows for building interactive user interfaces using a component-based architecture.
Programming Language: Apache Wicket is primarily used with Java, leveraging the power of the Java ecosystem and libraries. React, on the other hand, is primarily used with JavaScript, making it more accessible to a wider range of developers.
State Management: Apache Wicket handles state management on the server-side, where the server keeps track of the state of components and updates the HTML sent to the client accordingly. React, on the other hand, manages state on the client-side using a virtual DOM and a one-way data flow, making it more efficient for handling complex user interfaces.
Reusability and Componentization: Apache Wicket encourages the reuse of components and provides a rich set of reusable UI components out-of-the-box. React takes reusability to the next level with its component-based architecture, allowing developers to create highly modular and reusable UI components.
Ecosystem and Community: Apache Wicket has been around for quite some time and has a mature ecosystem and a dedicated community of developers, making it a reliable choice for enterprise applications. React, on the other hand, has gained immense popularity in recent years and has a vibrant ecosystem with a wide range of tools, libraries, and community support.
Learning Curve and Ease of Use: Apache Wicket has a steeper learning curve due to its Java-based approach and the need to understand the server-side rendering model. React, on the other hand, has a relatively lower learning curve for developers familiar with JavaScript, and its declarative nature makes it easier to write and understand code.

Apache Wicket vs React

Overview

Apache Wicket vs React: What are the differences?